Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2026
Interactive deep learning for myocardial scar segmentation using cardiovascular magnetic resonance.
СтатьяВалидационное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Moafi Aida, Moafi Danial, Shergill Simran, Mirkes Evgeny M, Adlam David, Samani Nilesh J, McCann Gerry P, Ghazi Mostafa Mehdipour, Arnold J Ranjit
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Following myocardial infarction, late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) assessed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) provides a reliable metric for risk stratification and therapeutic planning. However, conventional segmentation methods are time-consuming and labor-intensive, with high inter-observer variability and inconsistent performance in routine clinical practice. This study sought to develop an interactive deep learning system for scar segmentation and quantification.
METHODS: The framework was developed and evaluated using LGE-CMR images from 348 patients with chronic myocardial infarction (244 training, 51 validation, and 53 test). The model incorporates prompt-guided segmentation and leverages a vision foundation model adapted for medical imaging, integrated into a clinician-facing interface for real-time interaction, and automated quantification. Training used a composite loss function combining Dice overlap, voxel-wise cross-entropy, and Kullback-Leibler divergence against soft labels to address annotation uncertainty. Performance was evaluated on a held-out test set using expert manual annotations as the reference standard, with assessment of segmentation accuracy, repeatability, and agreement with the conventional full-width at half-maximum method (FWHM).
RESULTS: The framework achieved expert-level segmentation performance on the test set (Dice similarity coefficient = 0.74 ± 0.10; Hausdorff distance = 5.87 ± 6.79 mm) with a median scar mass error of 1.28 g (interquartile range [IQR] 0.74-2.34), corresponding to 1.4% (IQR 0.81-2.47) of left ventricular mass. Repeatability analysis (n = 41) demonstrated excellent agreement, with both inter- and intra-observer concordance correlation coefficients of 0.999 (compared with 0.737 and 0.952, respectively, for the conventional FWHM). Segmentation time was substantially reduced when using the interactive tool compared with the conventional workflow, averaging 65 ± 34 s per patient. Performance and repeatability remained high across the test set with differing levels of image quality.
CONCLUSION: The proposed framework for scar segmentation with a human-in-the-loop design enables fast, accurate, and highly reproducible myocardial scar quantification from LGE-CMR. This may provide more consistent performance in routine clinical workflows.
METHODS: The framework was developed and evaluated using LGE-CMR images from 348 patients with chronic myocardial infarction (244 training, 51 validation, and 53 test). The model incorporates prompt-guided segmentation and leverages a vision foundation model adapted for medical imaging, integrated into a clinician-facing interface for real-time interaction, and automated quantification. Training used a composite loss function combining Dice overlap, voxel-wise cross-entropy, and Kullback-Leibler divergence against soft labels to address annotation uncertainty. Performance was evaluated on a held-out test set using expert manual annotations as the reference standard, with assessment of segmentation accuracy, repeatability, and agreement with the conventional full-width at half-maximum method (FWHM).
RESULTS: The framework achieved expert-level segmentation performance on the test set (Dice similarity coefficient = 0.74 ± 0.10; Hausdorff distance = 5.87 ± 6.79 mm) with a median scar mass error of 1.28 g (interquartile range [IQR] 0.74-2.34), corresponding to 1.4% (IQR 0.81-2.47) of left ventricular mass. Repeatability analysis (n = 41) demonstrated excellent agreement, with both inter- and intra-observer concordance correlation coefficients of 0.999 (compared with 0.737 and 0.952, respectively, for the conventional FWHM). Segmentation time was substantially reduced when using the interactive tool compared with the conventional workflow, averaging 65 ± 34 s per patient. Performance and repeatability remained high across the test set with differing levels of image quality.
CONCLUSION: The proposed framework for scar segmentation with a human-in-the-loop design enables fast, accurate, and highly reproducible myocardial scar quantification from LGE-CMR. This may provide more consistent performance in routine clinical workflows.