Journal of orthopaedic case reports · 2026
Comparison of Surgical Outcomes and Perioperative Laboratory Parameters Following Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis versus Conventional Plating in Long Bone Fractures.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sharma Abhinav, Mishra Santosh Kumar, Yadav Mulayam Singh
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) has been increasingly adopted as an alternative to conventional open reduction and internal fixation due to its potential to preserve soft-tissue integrity and enhance fracture healing. This study aimed to compare surgical outcomes and perioperative laboratory parameters between MIPO and conventional plating.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective comparative study was conducted on 60 patients with long bone fractures, divided equally into MIPO (n = 30) and conventional plating (n = 30) groups. Intraoperative parameters, perioperative laboratory values (hemoglobin [Hb], total leukocyte count [TLC], C-reactive protein [CRP], and serum creatinine), and post-operative outcomes, including time to union and complications, were evaluated. Statistical analysis was performed using appropriate tests, with P < 0.05 considered significant.
RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups. The MIPO group demonstrated significantly shorter operative duration (72.5 ± 14.3 vs. 89.6 ± 16.8 min), reduced blood loss (118.4 ± 36.7 vs. 245.2 ± 52.1 mL), lower transfusion requirement (10.0% vs. 33.3%), and shorter hospital stay (6.2 ± 1.5 vs. 9.1 ± 2.3 days) (P < 0.05). Post-operative Hb levels were significantly higher, while TLC and CRP levels were significantly lower in the MIPO group on days 1 and 3 (P < 0.001). Mean time to union was shorter in the MIPO group (14.8 ± 2.6 vs. 17.2 ± 3.1 weeks, P = 0.002). Union rates and complication rates were comparable between groups (P > 0.05).
CONCLUSION: MIPO offers superior perioperative outcomes and reduced inflammatory response with comparable union rates and complications, making it an effective alternative to conventional plating.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective comparative study was conducted on 60 patients with long bone fractures, divided equally into MIPO (n = 30) and conventional plating (n = 30) groups. Intraoperative parameters, perioperative laboratory values (hemoglobin [Hb], total leukocyte count [TLC], C-reactive protein [CRP], and serum creatinine), and post-operative outcomes, including time to union and complications, were evaluated. Statistical analysis was performed using appropriate tests, with P < 0.05 considered significant.
RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups. The MIPO group demonstrated significantly shorter operative duration (72.5 ± 14.3 vs. 89.6 ± 16.8 min), reduced blood loss (118.4 ± 36.7 vs. 245.2 ± 52.1 mL), lower transfusion requirement (10.0% vs. 33.3%), and shorter hospital stay (6.2 ± 1.5 vs. 9.1 ± 2.3 days) (P < 0.05). Post-operative Hb levels were significantly higher, while TLC and CRP levels were significantly lower in the MIPO group on days 1 and 3 (P < 0.001). Mean time to union was shorter in the MIPO group (14.8 ± 2.6 vs. 17.2 ± 3.1 weeks, P = 0.002). Union rates and complication rates were comparable between groups (P > 0.05).
CONCLUSION: MIPO offers superior perioperative outcomes and reduced inflammatory response with comparable union rates and complications, making it an effective alternative to conventional plating.