Expert opinion on drug safety · 2024
Comparative evaluation of adverse drug reactions for tenofovir alafenamide and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate using the FAERS Database: a disproportionality analysis.
СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Zhu Meng, Jia Lingjuan, Wang Yike, Zhang Yongsheng, Lv Shengxia
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) are widely used nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs), necessitating a thorough understanding of their safety profiles to ensure optimal patient care and treatment adherence.
METHODS: We employed statistical methods including the reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN), and Multi-Item Gamma Poisson Shrinker (MGPS) to compare and evaluate the safety profiles of these NRTIs.
RESULTS: TAF was significantly associated with weight increase (ROR: 6.43; 95% CI: 5.93-6.96) and specific psychiatric disorders. TDF showed a notable signal for renal disorders and product-related issues, including product dose omission (ROR: 3.53; 95% CI: 3.22-3.87). Additionally, the study highlighted differences in safety signals related to pregnancy outcomes, with TAF having a higher ROR for maternal exposure (ROR: 7.83; 95% CI: 7.06-8.69) and TDF for fetal exposure (ROR: 4.51; 95% CI: 3.93-5.18), underscoring the need for cautious use in pregnant women. The comparative analysis also identified signals for osteonecrosis (ROR: 108.81; 95% CI: 106.25-111.43) and bone loss (ROR: 714; 95% CI: 685.49-743.68) for TAF and TDF, respectively, highlighting the importance of bone health considerations in treatment plans.
CONCLUSION: These findings underscore the importance of personalized antiviral therapy and patient safety.
METHODS: We employed statistical methods including the reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN), and Multi-Item Gamma Poisson Shrinker (MGPS) to compare and evaluate the safety profiles of these NRTIs.
RESULTS: TAF was significantly associated with weight increase (ROR: 6.43; 95% CI: 5.93-6.96) and specific psychiatric disorders. TDF showed a notable signal for renal disorders and product-related issues, including product dose omission (ROR: 3.53; 95% CI: 3.22-3.87). Additionally, the study highlighted differences in safety signals related to pregnancy outcomes, with TAF having a higher ROR for maternal exposure (ROR: 7.83; 95% CI: 7.06-8.69) and TDF for fetal exposure (ROR: 4.51; 95% CI: 3.93-5.18), underscoring the need for cautious use in pregnant women. The comparative analysis also identified signals for osteonecrosis (ROR: 108.81; 95% CI: 106.25-111.43) and bone loss (ROR: 714; 95% CI: 685.49-743.68) for TAF and TDF, respectively, highlighting the importance of bone health considerations in treatment plans.
CONCLUSION: These findings underscore the importance of personalized antiviral therapy and patient safety.