Journal of pediatric orthopedics · 2020
A Comparison of Transphyseal Neck-Head Tunneling and Multiple Epiphyseal Drilling on Femoral Head Healing Following Ischemic Osteonecrosis: An Experimental Investigation in Immature Pigs.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Aruwajoye Olumide O, Monte Felipe, Kim Audrey, Kim Harry K W
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Two operative procedures are currently advocated to stimulate the necrotic femoral head healing in children with Legg-Calve-Perthes disease: transphyseal neck-head tunneling (TNHT) and multiple epiphyseal drilling (MED). The purpose of this study was to compare the bone healing and physeal function after treatment with TNHT or MED in a piglet model of ischemic osteonecrosis.
METHODS: Eighteen piglets were induced with osteonecrosis by surgically placing a ligature tightly around the right femoral neck. One week later, the piglets were assigned to 1 of 3 treatment groups (n=6/group): (1) local nonweight bearing only (NWB), (2) TNHT plus NWB, or (3) MED plus NWB. The unoperated left femoral heads were used as normal controls. The animals were euthanized at 8 weeks after osteonecrosis induction. Histologic, histomorphometric, radiographic, microcomputed tomography (CT), and calcein-labeling assessments were performed. Statistical analysis included a 1-way ANOVA.
RESULTS: Micro-CT analyses showed higher femoral head bone volume in the MED group compared with the TNHT and the NWB groups (P<0.01). The MED group had a higher mean trabecular number (P<0.001) and new bone formation (P=0.001) based on calcein-labeling parameters compared with the TNHT and the NWB groups. In addition, the osteoclast number per bone surface was lower in the MED group compared with the NWB group (P=0.001). Histologic and micro-CT assessments of the proximal femoral physis revealed a larger physeal disruption at the site of physeal drilling in the TNHT group compared with the MED group. However, no significant differences in physeal elongation (P=0.61) and femoral neck length (P=0.31) were observed between the treatment groups.
CONCLUSIONS: MED produced a higher bone volume and stimulated greater bone formation than the TNHT or the NWB alone. Both procedures did not produce a significant physeal growth disturbance during the study period.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This preclinical study provides evidence that MED produces more favorable bone healing than the TNHT in a large animal model of Legg-Calve-Perthes disease.
METHODS: Eighteen piglets were induced with osteonecrosis by surgically placing a ligature tightly around the right femoral neck. One week later, the piglets were assigned to 1 of 3 treatment groups (n=6/group): (1) local nonweight bearing only (NWB), (2) TNHT plus NWB, or (3) MED plus NWB. The unoperated left femoral heads were used as normal controls. The animals were euthanized at 8 weeks after osteonecrosis induction. Histologic, histomorphometric, radiographic, microcomputed tomography (CT), and calcein-labeling assessments were performed. Statistical analysis included a 1-way ANOVA.
RESULTS: Micro-CT analyses showed higher femoral head bone volume in the MED group compared with the TNHT and the NWB groups (P<0.01). The MED group had a higher mean trabecular number (P<0.001) and new bone formation (P=0.001) based on calcein-labeling parameters compared with the TNHT and the NWB groups. In addition, the osteoclast number per bone surface was lower in the MED group compared with the NWB group (P=0.001). Histologic and micro-CT assessments of the proximal femoral physis revealed a larger physeal disruption at the site of physeal drilling in the TNHT group compared with the MED group. However, no significant differences in physeal elongation (P=0.61) and femoral neck length (P=0.31) were observed between the treatment groups.
CONCLUSIONS: MED produced a higher bone volume and stimulated greater bone formation than the TNHT or the NWB alone. Both procedures did not produce a significant physeal growth disturbance during the study period.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This preclinical study provides evidence that MED produces more favorable bone healing than the TNHT in a large animal model of Legg-Calve-Perthes disease.