MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/hed.27874

Медицинская библиотека · Head & neck · 2024

Impact of dose distribution by a 3D planning system for brachytherapy with 198Au grains for head and neck cancer.

Kishida Keita, Jingu Keiichi, Ito Kengo, Umezawa Rei, Yamamoto Takaya, Takahashi Noriyoshi, Suzuki Yu, Omata So, Harada Hinako, Seki Yasuhiro, Chiba Nanae, Okuda Shinsaku

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

There has been no study in which the correlation between clinical results and dosimetry based on a 3D treatment planning system in patients with 198Au grains for head and neck cancer was evaluated.

METHODS

Thirty-two patients who were treated with 198Au grains for head and neck cancer were reviewed. Twenty-five patients were treated with brachytherapy alone and seven patients were treated with a combination of brachytherapy and neoadjuvant external beam radiation therapy.

RESULTS

With a median observation period of 60 months, the 5-year local control rate was 82.9%. V85Gy of CTV in patients with local recurrence tended to be lower than that in patients without local recurrence (p = 0.07). The maximum dose of the keratinized gingiva in patients in whom bone exposure occurred was significantly higher than that in patients in whom bone exposure did not occur (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Dose distribution with 198Au grains can predict local control and late adverse events.

Для цитирования: Kishida Keita, Jingu Keiichi, Ito Kengo, Umezawa Rei, Yamamoto Takaya, Takahashi Noriyoshi, Suzuki Yu, Omata So, Harada Hinako, Seki Yasuhiro, Chiba Nanae, Okuda Shinsaku. Impact of dose distribution by a 3D planning system for brachytherapy with 198Au grains for head and neck cancer.. Head & neck. 2024. DOI: 10.1002/hed.27874.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.