Journal of diabetes and its complications · 2017
Bone mineral density and markers of bone turnover and inflammation in diabetes patients with or without a Charcot foot: An 8.5-year prospective case-control study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Jansen Rasmus Bo, Christensen Tomas Møller, Bülow Jens, Rørdam Lene, Holstein Per E, Jørgensen Niklas Rye, Svendsen Ole Lander
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Charcot foot is a rare but severe complication to diabetes and peripheral neuropathy. It is still unclear if an acute Charcot foot has long-term effects on the bone metabolism. To investigate this, we conducted a follow-up study to examine if a previously acute Charcot foot has any long-term effects on bone mineral density (BMD) or local or systemic bone metabolism.
METHODS: An 8.5-year follow-up case-control study of 44 individuals with diabetes mellitus, 24 of whom also had acute or chronic Charcot foot at the baseline visit in 2005-2007, who were followed up in 2015 with DXA scans and blood samples.
RESULTS: 21 of the 44 baseline participants participated in the follow-up. There were no difference in the change in total hip BMD from baseline to follow-up in either the Charcot or the control group (p = 0.402 and 0.517), and no increased risk of osteoporosis in the previous Charcot feet either. From baseline to follow-up, there was a significant difference in the change in levels of fsRANK-L in the Charcot group, but not in the control group (p = 0.002 and 0.232, respectively). At follow-up, there were no differences in fsRANK-L between the groups. The fsRANK-L/OPG ratio also significantly decreased from baseline to follow-up in the Charcot group (3.4 versus 0.5) (p = 0.009), but not in the control group (1.3 versus 1.1) (p = 0.302).
CONCLUSION: We found that diabetes patients with an acute Charcot foot have an elevated fsRANK-L/OPG ratio, and that the level decreased from baseline to follow-up to be comparable to the level in diabetes patients without previous or current Charcot foot. We found no permanent effect of an acute Charcot foot on hip or foot BMD.
METHODS: An 8.5-year follow-up case-control study of 44 individuals with diabetes mellitus, 24 of whom also had acute or chronic Charcot foot at the baseline visit in 2005-2007, who were followed up in 2015 with DXA scans and blood samples.
RESULTS: 21 of the 44 baseline participants participated in the follow-up. There were no difference in the change in total hip BMD from baseline to follow-up in either the Charcot or the control group (p = 0.402 and 0.517), and no increased risk of osteoporosis in the previous Charcot feet either. From baseline to follow-up, there was a significant difference in the change in levels of fsRANK-L in the Charcot group, but not in the control group (p = 0.002 and 0.232, respectively). At follow-up, there were no differences in fsRANK-L between the groups. The fsRANK-L/OPG ratio also significantly decreased from baseline to follow-up in the Charcot group (3.4 versus 0.5) (p = 0.009), but not in the control group (1.3 versus 1.1) (p = 0.302).
CONCLUSION: We found that diabetes patients with an acute Charcot foot have an elevated fsRANK-L/OPG ratio, and that the level decreased from baseline to follow-up to be comparable to the level in diabetes patients without previous or current Charcot foot. We found no permanent effect of an acute Charcot foot on hip or foot BMD.