MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/md.0000000000017735

Медицинская библиотека · Medicine · 2019

Risk of malignancy in Behcet disease: A meta-analysis with systematic review.

Wang Xin, Peng Yu, Gao Jun, Han Shiyuan, Li Yongning

СтатьяМетаанализСистематический обзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Several studies have reported the association of Behcet disease (BD) with the risk of diverse kinds of cancers. However, its association is controversial. Therefore, we conducted a bioinformatics-analysis to explore any possible association.

METHODS

We obtained relevant findings published before October 2018 through literature survey of the PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases. STATA 12.0 software was used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

After screening, the meta-analysis comprised 5 studies. We observed a significant positive association between BD and enhanced malignancy risk (pooled relative risk [RR], 1.19; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.09-1.30), especially for hematological cancer (pooled RR, 2.58; 95% CI: 1.61-3.55) and thyroid cancer (pooled RR, 1.25; 95% CI: 1.04-1.47). However, high heterogeneity was also observed in the results (I = 81.3%). Subgroup analysis indicated that female BD patients from Korean population are at highest predisposition to overall malignancy. Besides, publication bias was not observed with our choice of surveys.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that patients suffering from BD have an overall increased risk for malignancy. Greater numbers of exhaustive temporal studies are essential for definitive inferences.

Для цитирования: Wang Xin, Peng Yu, Gao Jun, Han Shiyuan, Li Yongning. Risk of malignancy in Behcet disease: A meta-analysis with systematic review.. Medicine. 2019. DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000017735.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.