MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.5588/pha.25.0054

Медицинская библиотека · Public health action · 2026

The return on investment of TB contact tracing in New York City.

Goldwater J, Harris Y, Neustrom K, Trieu L, Chuck C, Gao L

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

SETTING

In 2013, the New York City Health Department analysed its TB contact tracing programme. Despite long-term declines, TB remained a persistent public health issue in New York City, necessitating continued investment in prevention strategies.

OBJECTIVES

The aim was to evaluate the financial and public health impact of the TB contact tracing programme by conducting a return-on-investment (ROI) analysis.

DESIGN

The study measured programme costs - including personnel, diagnostics, and follow-up care - against projected savings from averted TB cases. A sensitivity analysis was conducted to assess the impact of varying progression rates from TB infection (TBI) to active TB.

RESULTS

The programme identified 3,250 contacts and prevented 64 potential TB cases through early detection and TBI treatment. This resulted in a 95.13% ROI, meaning that for every dollar invested, nearly another dollar was saved. The ROI increased under assumptions of higher TBI progression rates, reinforcing the programme's cost-effectiveness.

CONCLUSION

Contact tracing plays a critical role in TB control, especially in urban areas with higher incidence. The evaluation supports sustained investment in public health infrastructure and demonstrates that the model can be applied to other infectious disease programmes for targeted prevention and early intervention.

Для цитирования: Goldwater J, Harris Y, Neustrom K, Trieu L, Chuck C, Gao L. The return on investment of TB contact tracing in New York City.. Public health action. 2026. DOI: 10.5588/pha.25.0054.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.