MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3109/03009747809098843

Медицинская библиотека · Scandinavian journal of rheumatology · 1978

Quantitative 99mTc pertechnetate scanning of the sacro-iliac joints. A follow-up study of patients with suspected sacro-iliitis.

Szanto E, Lindvall N

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Quantitative 99mTc pertechnetate sacro-iliac scanning (QTPS) was performed in 30 patients suspected of having sacro-iliac arthritis (SI). Abnormal scanning results but lack of definite radiographic changes were noted in all of them. Twenty-four of these patients were followed-up for an average of 3.4 years; roentgenological abnormalities were found in 23 patients, or 95%, namely definite SI in 13, slight abnormalities in 1 previously normal patient, inactive changes in 3, suspected SI was unchanged in the radiographs in 5 and regression of previously observed grad-I changes was found in 1. In only 1 patient was the radiological picture unchanged normal. No definite roentgenological SI developed in any of the 12 controls (patients with normal (QTPS) we followed in the same way. A close correlation was noted between the QTPS and the patients' complaints of low back pain/stiffness and the clinical findings, including the presence of HLA-B27. The present study confirms that, despite the absence of radiographic changes, QTPS allows identification of a group of clinical and laboratory features which together are sufficiently characteristic of SI to establish that diagnosis. QTPS also enables us to discover clinically silent SI.

Для цитирования: Szanto E, Lindvall N. Quantitative 99mTc pertechnetate scanning of the sacro-iliac joints. A follow-up study of patients with suspected sacro-iliitis.. Scandinavian journal of rheumatology. 1978. DOI: 10.3109/03009747809098843.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.