Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery · 2026
Assistant experience enhances the learning curve in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a comparative cumulative sum analysis of 3 surgeons.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Taniguchi So, Hirakawa Yoshihiro, Manaka Tomoya, Nakazawa Katsumasa, Ito Yoichi, Terai Hidetomi
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) is an established treatment for cuff tear arthropathy, irreparable rotator cuff tears, and advanced glenohumeral osteoarthritis. However, despite advances in implant design and preoperative planning, rTSA remains technically demanding during early experience, and the influence of assistant experience on learning curves is unclear.
METHODS: This retrospective study evaluated the early learning curves of 3 shoulder surgeons (Surgeons A-C), each assessed over their first 60 consecutive rTSA cases. All surgeons shared similar subspecialty training in shoulder surgery but differed in their assistant experience pathways before independent practice: no prior assistant exposure, assistant experience during early technique evolution, and assistant experience under mature and standardized surgical workflows. Learning trends were analyzed using cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis of operative time, with each surgeon's individual mean used as the reference, and breakpoints were identified by changes in the CUSUM slope. Intraoperative blood loss was assessed using box-and-whisker plots, with cases categorized into 3 sequential groups of 20 cases. Intraoperative and postoperative complications were recorded and overlaid on the CUSUM curves to evaluate their temporal distribution during the learning process.
RESULTS: CUSUM analysis demonstrated distinct learning patterns among the surgeons. Surgeon A showed a pronounced initial upward CUSUM trend, with a breakpoint at approximately 30-40 cases, followed by stabilization. Surgeon B exhibited a similar biphasic pattern with a more gradual initial slope and an earlier breakpoint at approximately 25-35 cases. In contrast, Surgeon C demonstrated minimal early CUSUM elevation and reached a plateau at approximately 15-20 cases, indicating more rapid stabilization of operative efficiency. Intraoperative blood loss decreased progressively with experience for all surgeons; however, reductions in blood loss lagged behind the stabilization of operative time. Surgeons A and B showed wide variability in blood loss during the first 20 cases, with gradual narrowing in later phases, whereas Surgeon C demonstrated relatively stable blood loss from the early phase. Both intraoperative and postoperative complications were predominantly observed during the early ascending phase of the CUSUM curves, with few events occurring after stabilization.
CONCLUSION: Proficiency in rTSA develops in a stepwise manner and is strongly influenced by prior assistant experience. Assistant training under proficient surgeons facilitates earlier stabilization of operative time, blood loss, and perioperative safety, suggesting that high-quality assistant experience is essential for optimizing the rTSA learning curve.
METHODS: This retrospective study evaluated the early learning curves of 3 shoulder surgeons (Surgeons A-C), each assessed over their first 60 consecutive rTSA cases. All surgeons shared similar subspecialty training in shoulder surgery but differed in their assistant experience pathways before independent practice: no prior assistant exposure, assistant experience during early technique evolution, and assistant experience under mature and standardized surgical workflows. Learning trends were analyzed using cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis of operative time, with each surgeon's individual mean used as the reference, and breakpoints were identified by changes in the CUSUM slope. Intraoperative blood loss was assessed using box-and-whisker plots, with cases categorized into 3 sequential groups of 20 cases. Intraoperative and postoperative complications were recorded and overlaid on the CUSUM curves to evaluate their temporal distribution during the learning process.
RESULTS: CUSUM analysis demonstrated distinct learning patterns among the surgeons. Surgeon A showed a pronounced initial upward CUSUM trend, with a breakpoint at approximately 30-40 cases, followed by stabilization. Surgeon B exhibited a similar biphasic pattern with a more gradual initial slope and an earlier breakpoint at approximately 25-35 cases. In contrast, Surgeon C demonstrated minimal early CUSUM elevation and reached a plateau at approximately 15-20 cases, indicating more rapid stabilization of operative efficiency. Intraoperative blood loss decreased progressively with experience for all surgeons; however, reductions in blood loss lagged behind the stabilization of operative time. Surgeons A and B showed wide variability in blood loss during the first 20 cases, with gradual narrowing in later phases, whereas Surgeon C demonstrated relatively stable blood loss from the early phase. Both intraoperative and postoperative complications were predominantly observed during the early ascending phase of the CUSUM curves, with few events occurring after stabilization.
CONCLUSION: Proficiency in rTSA develops in a stepwise manner and is strongly influenced by prior assistant experience. Assistant training under proficient surgeons facilitates earlier stabilization of operative time, blood loss, and perioperative safety, suggesting that high-quality assistant experience is essential for optimizing the rTSA learning curve.