Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2024
Accuracy and reliability of imaging modalities for studying bipolar bone loss in anterior shoulder instability: A systematic review.
Систематический обзорСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Adriani Marco, Saccomanno Maristella Francesca, Bergomi Andrea, De Filippo Francesco, Daffara Valerio, Milano Giuseppe
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Recurrent shoulder instability, a common musculoskeletal disorder, often involves glenoid bone loss and Hill-Sachs lesions. However, the optimal imaging modality for accurately and reliably quantifying bipolar bone loss remains uncertain. This systematic review aims to evaluate the accuracy and reliability of various imaging modalities in assessing bipolar bone loss in anterior shoulder instability.
METHODS: Major electronic databases were searched for English-language studies reporting the measurement of glenoid track width and/or determination of on/off track HSL through imaging. Studies reporting statistical measures such as area under the curve, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, NPV, intraobserver reliability and interobserver reliability were included. Data extraction and risk of bias assessment were performed independently by two reviewers.
RESULTS: The systematic review included 19 studies comprising 1567 shoulders. Overall, studies could be divided into those looking at the accuracy or reliability of determining glenoid track width, on- or off-track Hill-Sachs lesions and near-track lesions. Three-dimensional images of computed tomography (3D-CT) was the most reliable and accurate imaging modality to measure the glenoid track width. On the opposite, two-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging (2D-MRI) did not provide enough evidence of accuracy and reliability in the determination of On/Off track lesions and near-track lesions.
CONCLUSION: 3D-CT demonstrated excellent reliability for measuring glenoid track width. However, the reliability of 2D-MRI for determining on/off track Hill-Sachs lesions is still controversial.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.
METHODS: Major electronic databases were searched for English-language studies reporting the measurement of glenoid track width and/or determination of on/off track HSL through imaging. Studies reporting statistical measures such as area under the curve, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, NPV, intraobserver reliability and interobserver reliability were included. Data extraction and risk of bias assessment were performed independently by two reviewers.
RESULTS: The systematic review included 19 studies comprising 1567 shoulders. Overall, studies could be divided into those looking at the accuracy or reliability of determining glenoid track width, on- or off-track Hill-Sachs lesions and near-track lesions. Three-dimensional images of computed tomography (3D-CT) was the most reliable and accurate imaging modality to measure the glenoid track width. On the opposite, two-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging (2D-MRI) did not provide enough evidence of accuracy and reliability in the determination of On/Off track lesions and near-track lesions.
CONCLUSION: 3D-CT demonstrated excellent reliability for measuring glenoid track width. However, the reliability of 2D-MRI for determining on/off track Hill-Sachs lesions is still controversial.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.