DOI 10.3389/falgy.2026.1780330
A meta-analysis of acupuncture at the sphenopalatine ganglion for the treatment of allergic rhinitis.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Allergic rhinitis (AR) imposes a significant global health burden. While conventional treatments include medications and immunotherapy, acupuncture at the sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) has emerged as a promising alternative. This meta-analysis evaluates the efficacy of SPG acupuncture for AR.
METHODS
We searched CNKI, PubMed, Web of Science, SinMed, and Cochrane Library (inception to May 2024) for RCTs comparing SPG acupuncture against controls (conventional acupuncture/sham/medications). Primary outcomes were Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) change, Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) change, and total effective rate. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane criteria. Meta-analyses used random/fixed models in RevMan 5.3; evidence quality was graded via GRADE.
RESULTS
Eleven RCTs (= 732) were analyzed. SPG acupuncture significantly: Improved RQLQ (MD = 7.63, 95% CI: 2.81 to 12.45, P = 0.002; low-quality evidence).Reduced TNSS (MD = 2.23, 95% CI: 0.92 to 3.55, P = 0.0009; low-quality evidence).Increased total effective rate ((RR = 1.17, 95% CI: 1.06 to 1.29, P = 0.002; moderate-quality evidence).No IgE improvement was observed (P = 0.23). Heterogeneity was high for RQLQ (I2 = 89%) and TNSS (I2 = 83%).
CONCLUSION
Eleven RCTs with a total of 732 participants were analyzed. SPG acupuncture improves quality of life, nasal symptoms, and clinical efficacy in AR patients vs. conventional treatments, though evidence quality remains low to moderate. It represents a viable adjunct therapy, warranting further high-quality trials.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.