Frontiers in psychology · 2022
Attention impairment in patients with cervical dystonia: An attention network test study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Xia Kun, Han Yongsheng, Zhou Lanlan, Hu Sheng, Rao Rao, Shan Shu, Hua Lei
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate attentional network functional characteristics in patients with cervical dystonia (CD).
METHODS: A total of 29 patients with CD and 26 healthy controls (HCs) were recruited. All subjects participated in the study and underwent the Attention Network Test (ANT), which evaluated the efficiencies of three independent attention networks (alerting, orienting, and executive control), as well as reaction time (RT) and accuracy.
RESULTS: Significant differences between CD patients (9.86 ± 27.95 ms) and HCs (33.62 ± 23.41 ms) were observed in the alerting network (t = -3.40, p < 0.05). In contrast, the orienting network (t = 0.26, p = 0.79), executive control network (Z = -0.55, p = 0.58), total mean reaction time (t = -2.6, p = 0.79), and total accuracy rate (Z = -1.67, p = 0.09) showed no significant differences between the two groups.
CONCLUSION: Patients with CD showed a significant deficit in the alerting network. However, they did not show any deficits in the orienting or executive control network. In addition, the alerting, orienting, and executive control network functions of CD patients were all affected by the severity of torticollis, especially the alerting network function.
METHODS: A total of 29 patients with CD and 26 healthy controls (HCs) were recruited. All subjects participated in the study and underwent the Attention Network Test (ANT), which evaluated the efficiencies of three independent attention networks (alerting, orienting, and executive control), as well as reaction time (RT) and accuracy.
RESULTS: Significant differences between CD patients (9.86 ± 27.95 ms) and HCs (33.62 ± 23.41 ms) were observed in the alerting network (t = -3.40, p < 0.05). In contrast, the orienting network (t = 0.26, p = 0.79), executive control network (Z = -0.55, p = 0.58), total mean reaction time (t = -2.6, p = 0.79), and total accuracy rate (Z = -1.67, p = 0.09) showed no significant differences between the two groups.
CONCLUSION: Patients with CD showed a significant deficit in the alerting network. However, they did not show any deficits in the orienting or executive control network. In addition, the alerting, orienting, and executive control network functions of CD patients were all affected by the severity of torticollis, especially the alerting network function.