MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.reuma.2019.03.005

Медицинская библиотека · Reumatologia clinica · 2019

Neuro-Behçet Disease in the Central University Hospital of Asturias.

Charca-Benavente Lilyan C, Gómez de la Torre Ricardo, Caminal-Montero Luis, Coto-Hernández Rubén, Colunga-Argüelles Dolores

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To describe the frequency and profile of patients with neuro-Behçet's disease (NBD) at the Central University Hospital of Asturias between 1981 and June 2018.

PATIENTS AND

METHODS

Retrospective study including epidemiological, clinical, neuroimaging, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) study, histopathology, treatment and evolution characteristics. Clinical characteristics are differentiated between patients with Behçet without neurological affectation and NBD.

RESULTS

We found 10 cases of NBD (25.6%). The mean age was 29.7years, and it was more frequent in males. Sixty percent had parenchymal involvement. The non-parenchymal involvement included a case with cerebral venous thrombosis and two cases with isolated aseptic meningitis. Findings of vasculitis were found on cerebral magnetic resonance imaging, and alteration in the biochemistry of the CSF. One patient presented a striking motor disability. Ocular involvement was greater in the group of patients without neurological involvement (P=0.009).

CONCLUSIONS

NBD is a relatively frequent presentation, especially in males and in the parenchymal form. We did not find a systemic clinical marker of neurological involvement.

Для цитирования: Charca-Benavente Lilyan C, Gómez de la Torre Ricardo, Caminal-Montero Luis, Coto-Hernández Rubén, Colunga-Argüelles Dolores. Neuro-Behçet Disease in the Central University Hospital of Asturias.. Reumatologia clinica. 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.reuma.2019.03.005.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.