Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism · 2020
Rituximab for rheumatoid arthritis-associated large granular lymphocytic leukemia, a retrospective case series.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lobbes Hervé, Dervout Charles, Toussirot Eric, Felten Renaud, Sibilia Jean, Wendling Daniel, Gombert Bruno, Ruivard Marc, Grobost Vincent, Saraux Alain, Cornec Divi, Verhoeven Frank, Soubrier Martin
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy and tolerance profile of rituximab in rheumatoid arthritis (RA)-associated large granular lymphocyte leukemia (LGLL).
METHODS: Multicenter retrospective case series. Inclusion criteria were RA defined by the ACR/EULAR 2010 criteria and LGLL defined by absolute LGL count ≥ 0.3 × 109/L with evidence of an expanded clonal LGL population (flow cytometry, TCR-γ polymerase chain reaction, or Stat3 mutation).
RESULTS: Fourteen patients (10 women, mean age 55.2 ± 14.2 years) included; 13 were seropositive for anti-cyclic citrullinated peptides (n = 11) or rheumatoid factor (n = 10). LGLL diagnosis was made 9.5 [IQR: 3.25;15.5] years after RA diagnosis. Thirteen patients had T-LGLL. Rituximab was the first-line therapy for LGLL for 4 patients. Previous treatment lines included methotrexate (n = 7), cyclophosphamide (n = 2), cyclosporin A (n = 1), or granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (n = 4). Rituximab was used in monotherapy (n = 8) or associated to methotrexate (n = 3), granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (n = 2), or alkylating agents (n = 1). The number of rituximab cycles ranged from 1 to 11 (median 6), with high heterogeneity in dosing regimens. Median duration response after rituximab initiation was 35 [IQR: 23.5;41] months. The overall response rate was 100%: 8 patients experienced complete response (normalization of blood count and LGL ≤ 0.3 × 109/L) and 6 experienced partial responses (improvement in blood counts without complete normalization). The tolerance profile was good, with no infectious complications.
CONCLUSION: rituximab appears as a valuable therapeutic option for RA-associated LGLL.
METHODS: Multicenter retrospective case series. Inclusion criteria were RA defined by the ACR/EULAR 2010 criteria and LGLL defined by absolute LGL count ≥ 0.3 × 109/L with evidence of an expanded clonal LGL population (flow cytometry, TCR-γ polymerase chain reaction, or Stat3 mutation).
RESULTS: Fourteen patients (10 women, mean age 55.2 ± 14.2 years) included; 13 were seropositive for anti-cyclic citrullinated peptides (n = 11) or rheumatoid factor (n = 10). LGLL diagnosis was made 9.5 [IQR: 3.25;15.5] years after RA diagnosis. Thirteen patients had T-LGLL. Rituximab was the first-line therapy for LGLL for 4 patients. Previous treatment lines included methotrexate (n = 7), cyclophosphamide (n = 2), cyclosporin A (n = 1), or granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (n = 4). Rituximab was used in monotherapy (n = 8) or associated to methotrexate (n = 3), granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (n = 2), or alkylating agents (n = 1). The number of rituximab cycles ranged from 1 to 11 (median 6), with high heterogeneity in dosing regimens. Median duration response after rituximab initiation was 35 [IQR: 23.5;41] months. The overall response rate was 100%: 8 patients experienced complete response (normalization of blood count and LGL ≤ 0.3 × 109/L) and 6 experienced partial responses (improvement in blood counts without complete normalization). The tolerance profile was good, with no infectious complications.
CONCLUSION: rituximab appears as a valuable therapeutic option for RA-associated LGLL.