MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/acr.22585

Медицинская библиотека · Arthritis care & research · 2015

Study for Updated Gout Classification Criteria: Identification of Features to Classify Gout.

Taylor William J, Fransen Jaap, Jansen Tim L, Dalbeth Nicola, Schumacher H Ralph, Brown Melanie, Louthrenoo Worawit, Vazquez-Mellado Janitzia, Eliseev Maxim, McCarthy Geraldine, Stamp Lisa K, Perez-Ruiz Fernando, Sivera Francisca, Ea Hang-Korng, Gerritsen Martijn, Scire Carlo, Cavagna Lorenzo, Lin Chingtsai, Chou Yin-Yi, Tausche Anne Kathrin, Vargas-Santos Ana Beatriz, Janssen Matthijs, Chen Jiunn-Horng, Slot Ole, Cimmino Marco A, Uhlig Till, Neogi Tuhina

СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To determine which clinical, laboratory, and imaging features most accurately distinguished gout from non-gout.

METHODS

We performed a cross-sectional study of consecutive rheumatology clinic patients with ≥1 swollen joint or subcutaneous tophus. Gout was defined by synovial fluid or tophus aspirate microscopy by certified examiners in all patients. The sample was randomly divided into a model development (two-thirds) and test sample (one-third). Univariate and multivariate association between clinical features and monosodium urate-defined gout was determined using logistic regression modeling. Shrinkage of regression weights was performed to prevent overfitting of the final model. Latent class analysis was conducted to identify patterns of joint involvement.

RESULTS

In total, 983 patients were included. Gout was present in 509 (52%). In the development sample (n = 653), the following features were selected for the final model: joint erythema (multivariate odds ratio [OR] 2.13), difficulty walking (multivariate OR 7.34), time to maximal pain <24 hours (multivariate OR 1.32), resolution by 2 weeks (multivariate OR 3.58), tophus (multivariate OR 7.29), first metatarsophalangeal (MTP1) joint ever involved (multivariate OR 2.30), location of currently tender joints in other foot/ankle (multivariate OR 2.28) or MTP1 joint (multivariate OR 2.82), serum urate level >6 mg/dl (0.36 mmoles/liter; multivariate OR 3.35), ultrasound double contour sign (multivariate OR 7.23), and radiograph erosion or cyst (multivariate OR 2.49). The final model performed adequately in the test set, with no evidence of misfit, high discrimination, and predictive ability. MTP1 joint involvement was the most common joint pattern (39.4%) in gout cases.

CONCLUSION

Ten key discriminating features have been identified for further evaluation for new gout classification criteria. Ultrasound findings and degree of uricemia add discriminating value, and will significantly contribute to more accurate classification criteria.

Для цитирования: Taylor William J, Fransen Jaap, Jansen Tim L, Dalbeth Nicola, Schumacher H Ralph, Brown Melanie, Louthrenoo Worawit, Vazquez-Mellado Janitzia, Eliseev Maxim, McCarthy Geraldine, Stamp Lisa K, Perez-Ruiz Fernando, Sivera Francisca, Ea Hang-Korng, Gerritsen Martijn, Scire Carlo, Cavagna Lorenzo, Lin Chingtsai, Chou Yin-Yi, Tausche Anne Kathrin, Vargas-Santos Ana Beatriz, Janssen Matthijs, Chen Jiunn-Horng, Slot Ole, Cimmino Marco A, Uhlig Till, Neogi Tuhina. Study for Updated Gout Classification Criteria: Identification of Features to Classify Gout.. Arthritis care & research. 2015. DOI: 10.1002/acr.22585.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.