MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1186/s12889-025-22051-5

Медицинская библиотека · BMC public health · 2025

Knowledge, attitude, and practice toward cervical spondylosis among the healthy general population.

Li Shuyang, Liu Tongyu, Yang Qian, Zhao Yanbin, Chen Xin, Pan Shengfa, Sun Yu, Zhou Feifei

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to investigate the knowledge, attitude and practice (KAP) of the healthy general population toward cervical spondylosis.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted among healthy individuals at Peking University Third Hospital between May and December 2023, utilizing a self-designed questionnaire.

RESULTS

A total of 506 valid questionnaires were collected, of which 276 (64.94%) were completed by females. The mean scores for knowledge, attitudes, and practices were 4.07 ± 1.24 (range: 0-8), 35.69 ± 3.67 (range: 9-45), and 27.01 ± 4.38 (range: 9-36), respectively. Structural equation modeling (SEM) revealed that knowledge had a direct influence on both attitudes (β = 0.589, P = 0.002) and practices (β = 0.353, P = 0.020). Furthermore, attitudes had a direct effect on practices (β = 0.442, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The healthy general population demonstrated inadequate knowledge, a positive attitude, and suboptimal practices regarding cervical spondylosis. These findings highlight the need for targeted educational interventions to improve public awareness and foster healthier practices in managing cervical spondylosis.

Для цитирования: Li Shuyang, Liu Tongyu, Yang Qian, Zhao Yanbin, Chen Xin, Pan Shengfa, Sun Yu, Zhou Feifei. Knowledge, attitude, and practice toward cervical spondylosis among the healthy general population.. BMC public health. 2025. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-025-22051-5.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.