Rehabilitacion · 2026
Concurrent validity and reliability of a telehealth-based administration of the Craig Hospital Inventory of Environmental Factors in people with rheumatoid arthritis.
СтатьяВалидационное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Vargas Dias F M, Leite K C, Boening A, Nascimento L R
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Telephone-based application of questionnaires may be valuable and cost-effective approaches for remote evaluation of patients.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to examine the concurrent validity of the telephone-based application of the Craig Hospital Inventory of Environmental Factors (CHIEF) in comparison with in-person application, and its measurement properties, in people with rheumatoid arthritis.
METHODS: A methodological study was conducted. Participants were requested to answer the questionnaire on four randomized occasions: three times by telephone, and once in-person. Concurrent validity, test-retest, and inter-rater reliability of the telephone-based application of the CHIEF were reported.
RESULTS: Sixty participants (52 women) chronically diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis were included. There were no significant differences between the mean scores obtained by telephone- and in-person applications of the CHIEF (MD 3; 95% CI -4 to 9; p=0.38). Overall, a high agreement was found (ICC=0.83; 95% CI 0.72 to 0.90). A very high test-retest agreement (ICC=0.99; 95% CI 0.98 to 0.99) and a high inter-rater agreement (ICC=0.88; 95% CI 0.78 to 0.93) of the total scores obtained by telephone applications was found.
CONCLUSION: In people with rheumatoid arthritis, the results suggested that there is no difference when the CHIEF is applied by telephone or during in-person interviews. This could help encourage new studies examining the influence of environmental factors on social participation in people with rheumatoid arthritis. In conclusion, the telephone-based application of the CHIEF showed to be a valid and reliable method for the assessment of barriers to participation in people with rheumatoid arthritis.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to examine the concurrent validity of the telephone-based application of the Craig Hospital Inventory of Environmental Factors (CHIEF) in comparison with in-person application, and its measurement properties, in people with rheumatoid arthritis.
METHODS: A methodological study was conducted. Participants were requested to answer the questionnaire on four randomized occasions: three times by telephone, and once in-person. Concurrent validity, test-retest, and inter-rater reliability of the telephone-based application of the CHIEF were reported.
RESULTS: Sixty participants (52 women) chronically diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis were included. There were no significant differences between the mean scores obtained by telephone- and in-person applications of the CHIEF (MD 3; 95% CI -4 to 9; p=0.38). Overall, a high agreement was found (ICC=0.83; 95% CI 0.72 to 0.90). A very high test-retest agreement (ICC=0.99; 95% CI 0.98 to 0.99) and a high inter-rater agreement (ICC=0.88; 95% CI 0.78 to 0.93) of the total scores obtained by telephone applications was found.
CONCLUSION: In people with rheumatoid arthritis, the results suggested that there is no difference when the CHIEF is applied by telephone or during in-person interviews. This could help encourage new studies examining the influence of environmental factors on social participation in people with rheumatoid arthritis. In conclusion, the telephone-based application of the CHIEF showed to be a valid and reliable method for the assessment of barriers to participation in people with rheumatoid arthritis.