MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.13107/jocr.2025.v15.i03.5374

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of orthopaedic case reports · 2025

Distal Femoral Nail as a Cost-Effective Alternative to Tibiotalocalcaneal Nail for Ankle Fracture Non-Union in an Elderly Patient: A Case Report.

Kumar Pawan, Das Abhishek Kumar, Behera Sudarsan, Raj Manish, Bhadani Janki Sharan, Mishra Baibhav

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

Ankle fracture non-union in elderly patients is challenging due to osteoporotic bone, comorbidities, and risks associated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). Tibiotalocalcaneal (TTC) nail fixation enables early weight-bearing but is costly and not widely available in resource-limited settings.

CASE REPORT: We present an 83-year-old male with a painful, deformed left ankle and non-union of a bimalleolar fracture treated conservatively. Comorbidities included diabetes mellitus and hypertension. Due to fragile skin and high ORIF-associated risks, a distal femoral nail (DFN) was used as a substitute for a TTC nail. A minimally invasive technique was performed, including joint preparation and medial malleolar bone grafting. Weight-bearing was initiated postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

DFN offered comparable fixation with reduced cost and acceptable complications. This case highlights DFN's utility as a TTC nail substitute in elderly patients, ensuring stability, early mobilization, and functional recovery in low-resource settings.

Для цитирования: Kumar Pawan, Das Abhishek Kumar, Behera Sudarsan, Raj Manish, Bhadani Janki Sharan, Mishra Baibhav. Distal Femoral Nail as a Cost-Effective Alternative to Tibiotalocalcaneal Nail for Ankle Fracture Non-Union in an Elderly Patient: A Case Report.. Journal of orthopaedic case reports. 2025. DOI: 10.13107/jocr.2025.v15.i03.5374.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.