MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/bsd.0000000000001792

Медицинская библиотека · Clinical spine surgery · 2025

Establishing a Threshold of Impairment to Define Preoperative Coronal Malalignment in Adult Spinal Deformity Patients.

Zuckerman Scott L, Hassan Fthimnir M, Lai Christopher S, Shen Yong, Kerolus Mena, Ha Alex, Buchannan Ian, Cerpa Meghan, Lee Nathan J, Sardar Zeeshan M, Lehman Ronald A, Lenke Lawrence G

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

STUDY

DESIGN

Single-center retrospective analysis.

OBJECTIVE

To establish an empirically derived threshold to define both coronal and sagittal malalignment (CM & SM) based on preoperative patient-reported outcomes (PROs).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Currently, no radiographic alignment threshold defines preoperative CM in adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients based on disability. In a cohort of ASD patients undergoing corrective surgery, we sought to establish a threshold to define both CM and SM based on PRO and assess the clinical impact of CM and combined with SM.

METHODS

ASD patients with ≥6 level fusions were included. CVA and SVA were measured. PROs included preoperative ODI and SRS-22r scores. CVA and SVA thresholds were derived to accurately differentiate patients with ODI >40 and SRS-pain+function <5. Patients were then separated into 4 groups: (1) neutral alignment (NA); (2) CM; (3) SM; and (4) combined coronal and sagittal malalignment (CCSM).

RESULTS

Totally, 368 patients were included. Thresholds to distinguish patients with ODI ≥40 and SRS-pain/function <5 were: (1) CVA=3.96 cm (ODI) and 3.17 cm (SRS); (2) SVA=4.97 cm (ODI) and 7.52 cm (SRS). The lower numbers were chosen to define each threshold: CVA=3 cm and SVA=5 cm. Alignment breakdown was: NA=179 (48.6%), CM=66 (17.9%), SM=65 (17.7%), and CCSM=58 (15.8%). Both SM=( P =0.006) and CCSM ( P <0.001) patients had significantly worse ODI scores than NA patients, and CCSM patients were significantly worse than SM alone ( P =0.010). On the basis of preoperative total SRS-22r scores, only CCSM ( P =0.003) patients were significantly worse than the NA group. CVA significantly correlated with 4/7 (57.1%) preoperative PROs (ODI/SRS-total/function/image), while SVA correlated with 5/7 (71.4%) preoperative PROs (ODI/SRS-total/function/image/pain). A linear relationship was seen between increasing CVA and worsening ODI (β=0.92, 95% CI: 0.37-1.48, P =0.001). A significant and slightly stronger relationship was seen between increasing SVA and worsening ODI (β=1.28, 95% CI: 1.00-1.56, P <0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

CM and SM thresholds that accurately distinguished ASD patients with severe pain and disability preoperatively were 3 cm for CVA and 5 cm for SVA, respectively. Preoperative CM was significantly associated with worse ODI, SRS-22r total/function/image scores. CCSM led to more disability than SM alone.

Для цитирования: Zuckerman Scott L, Hassan Fthimnir M, Lai Christopher S, Shen Yong, Kerolus Mena, Ha Alex, Buchannan Ian, Cerpa Meghan, Lee Nathan J, Sardar Zeeshan M, Lehman Ronald A, Lenke Lawrence G. Establishing a Threshold of Impairment to Define Preoperative Coronal Malalignment in Adult Spinal Deformity Patients.. Clinical spine surgery. 2025. DOI: 10.1097/bsd.0000000000001792.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.