DOI 10.1080/0886022x.2020.1804401
The influence of seasonal factors on the incidence of peritoneal dialysis-associated peritonitis.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES
To investigate the effects of climatic variables on peritoneal dialysis-associated peritonitis (PDAP) among patients receiving PD, such as seasonal variations in temperature and humidity.
METHODS
A retrospective analysis was performed on PD patients, from 1 January 2011, to 31 December 2019. We evaluated the influence of seasonal factors on peritonitis rates and outcomes.
RESULTS
Over the 9-year study period, 667 peritonitis episodes occurred, in 401 PD patients. Diarrhea-associated peritonitis occurred more frequently in summer compared with other seasons. Eating raw and cold food was identified as the primary cause of peritonitis in the summer. More peritonitis episodes occurred during summer. The peritonitis rate associated with gram-negative bacteria (p = 0.050) during summer was higher than those in all other seasons. The gram-negative bacterial peritonitis rate was positively correlated with monthly mean temperature (r = 0.504, p < 0.01) and humidity (r = 0.561, p < 0.01). A similar trend was observed for Enterobacterial peritonitis (temperature: r = 0.518, p < 0.01; humidity: r = 0.456, p = 0.001). Logistic regression analysis showed that summer was a risk factor for peritonitis (p = 0.041). Peritonitis prognosis during summer was significantly worse than those for all other seasons (p = 0.037).
CONCLUSIONS
Seasonal variations exist in the incidence of dialysis-associated peritonitis, with peak incidents caused by gram-negative bacteria in the summer. High average temperature and humidity are associated with significant increases in the gram-negative bacteria and Enterobacterial peritonitis rates. Peritonitis prognosis during summer is worse.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.