MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/md.0000000000023531

Медицинская библиотека · Medicine · 2020

Epidural steroids following percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.

Ran Qiang, Yu Yang, Li Tong, Fan Xiaohong

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy (PEID) has been widely used in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation and spinal stenosis, epidural steroids following PEID in an effort to reduce the incidence and duration of postoperative pain. Although steroids are widely thought to reduce the effect of surgical trauma, the observation index is not uniform, so the issue is still controversial. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of local epidural steroids application following PEID.

METHODS

We will search the following databases from their inception to August 2020, PubMed, Embase, Medline, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, Web of Science, Wan Fang Database, Cochrane Library. The search strategy includes the MeSH terms. Meta-analysis will be performed using Rev Man V.5.3.5 statistical software.

RESULTS

This study will provide a high-quality synthesis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of local epidural steroids following PEID.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review will provide evidence to judge whether local epidural steroids application following PEID is an effective and safe intervention for patients. It will provide reliable evidence for its extensive application.

REGISTRATION NUMBER: INPLASY2020100085.

Для цитирования: Ran Qiang, Yu Yang, Li Tong, Fan Xiaohong. Epidural steroids following percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.. Medicine. 2020. DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000023531.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.