Spine · 2024
Impact of Predictive Hemodynamic Monitoring on Intraoperative Hypotension and Postoperative Complications in Multi-level Spinal Fusion Surgery.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Carreon Leah Y, Glassman Steven D, Chappell Desiree, Garvin Steven, Lavelle Anna M, Gum Jeffrey L, Djurasovic Mladen, Saasouh Wael
Аннотация
STUDY DESIGN: Prospective longitudinal comparative cohort.
OBJECTIVES: To determine if the use of predictive hemodynamic monitoring (PHM) during elective multi-level posterior instrumented spine fusions decreases episodes of intraoperative hypotension (IOH) and complications.
BACKGROUND: A recent study showed an association between complications and duration of IOH in patients undergoing multi-level spine fusions. Whether the use of PHM to maintain hemodynamic stability intraoperatively decreases postoperative complications has not been evaluated.
METHODS: Adults undergoing elective multi-level posterior thoracolumbar fusion with arterial line blood pressure monitoring were identified and stratified into those in which predictive hemodynamic monitoring (PHM) was used and those in which it was not. Number of minutes of hypotension (MAP <65 mm Hg) and hypertension (MAP ≥100 mm Hg), volume of fluids, blood products and vasopressors administered intraoperatively and within the first 4 hours postoperatively as well as the number and type of postoperative complications were collected.
RESULTS: The 47 cases in the PHM group and 70 in the non-PHM group had similar demographic and operative characteristics. A shorter duration of IOH was seen in the PHM group (8.13 min) compared with the non-PHM group (13.28 min, P=0.029); and a shorter duration of intraoperative hypertension seen in the PHM group (0.46 min) compared with the non-PHM group (1.38 min, P=0.032). There was a smaller number of patients in the PHM group who had a surgical site infection (2.% vs. 13%, P=0.027), postoperative nausea and vomiting (0 vs. 14%, P=0.004) and postoperative cognitive dysfunction (6% vs. 19%, P=0.049) compared with the non-PHM group. There was also a statistically significant shorter length of hospitalization in the PHM (4.62 d) compared with the non-PHM group (5.99 d, P=0.017).
CONCLUSION: Predictive hemodynamic monitoring to manage intraoperative hemodynamic instability is associated with a shorter duration of intraoperative hypotension, a lower prevalence of complications, and a decreased hospital stay in multi-level spinal fusion surgery.
OBJECTIVES: To determine if the use of predictive hemodynamic monitoring (PHM) during elective multi-level posterior instrumented spine fusions decreases episodes of intraoperative hypotension (IOH) and complications.
BACKGROUND: A recent study showed an association between complications and duration of IOH in patients undergoing multi-level spine fusions. Whether the use of PHM to maintain hemodynamic stability intraoperatively decreases postoperative complications has not been evaluated.
METHODS: Adults undergoing elective multi-level posterior thoracolumbar fusion with arterial line blood pressure monitoring were identified and stratified into those in which predictive hemodynamic monitoring (PHM) was used and those in which it was not. Number of minutes of hypotension (MAP <65 mm Hg) and hypertension (MAP ≥100 mm Hg), volume of fluids, blood products and vasopressors administered intraoperatively and within the first 4 hours postoperatively as well as the number and type of postoperative complications were collected.
RESULTS: The 47 cases in the PHM group and 70 in the non-PHM group had similar demographic and operative characteristics. A shorter duration of IOH was seen in the PHM group (8.13 min) compared with the non-PHM group (13.28 min, P=0.029); and a shorter duration of intraoperative hypertension seen in the PHM group (0.46 min) compared with the non-PHM group (1.38 min, P=0.032). There was a smaller number of patients in the PHM group who had a surgical site infection (2.% vs. 13%, P=0.027), postoperative nausea and vomiting (0 vs. 14%, P=0.004) and postoperative cognitive dysfunction (6% vs. 19%, P=0.049) compared with the non-PHM group. There was also a statistically significant shorter length of hospitalization in the PHM (4.62 d) compared with the non-PHM group (5.99 d, P=0.017).
CONCLUSION: Predictive hemodynamic monitoring to manage intraoperative hemodynamic instability is associated with a shorter duration of intraoperative hypotension, a lower prevalence of complications, and a decreased hospital stay in multi-level spinal fusion surgery.