MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/md.0000000000043377

Медицинская библиотека · Medicine · 2025

Mendelian randomization analysis of C-reactive protein on septic arthritis risk.

Lei Hai, Tian Peng, Chen Jun, Chen Shuai, Lai Guochao, Zhou Linli

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Several observational studies have shown that C-reactive protein (CRP) is an effective biomarker for evaluating septic arthritis (SA). However, the inherent causal relationship of this connection has not yet been clarified. Thus, this study examined the potential causal association between CRP and SA risk using 2-sample Mendelian randomization (MR). The analysis used 2-sample MR, with the exposure and outcome data from the Genome-Wide Association Study Catalog and FinnGen, respectively. Throughout this study, inverse variance weighting has been used as the primary method. To assess the robustness of the research findings, Cochran Q test, Egger regression, and MR pleiotropy residual sum and outlier global tests were conducted. Genetically predicted CRP has a positive causal relationship with the risk of SA (ORinverse variance weighting = 1.37, 95% CI 1.16-1.63, P < .001), (ORMR Egger = 1.62, 95% CI 1.20-2.19, P = .002), (ORweighted media = 1.48, 95% CI 1.11-1.97, P = .008), and (ORMR PRESSO = 1.37, 95% CI 1.18-1.59, P < .001). A sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of this result. Our study has, for the first time, established a definite causal relationship between CRP and SA risk; that is, an increase in CRP levels leads to an increase in SA risk.

Для цитирования: Lei Hai, Tian Peng, Chen Jun, Chen Shuai, Lai Guochao, Zhou Linli. Mendelian randomization analysis of C-reactive protein on septic arthritis risk.. Medicine. 2025. DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000043377.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.