MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3389/fped.2026.1745252

Медицинская библиотека · Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026

Evaluation of the classification performance and cost-effectiveness of classification criteria in children with systemic lupus erythematosus.

Rodríguez-Lozano Ana Luisa, González-Garay Alejandro Gabriel, Villasis-Keever Miguel Ángel, Nájera-Velázquez Ruth G, Sáez-de-Ocariz Marimar, Scheffler-Mendoza Selma Cecilia, Rivas-Larrauri Francisco Eduardo, Yamazaki-Nakashimada Marco Antonio, García-De La Puente Silvestre

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus (cSLE) is a chronic autoimmune disease. In Latin America, the utility of the existing lupus classification criteria and their economic implications remain unexplored.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate and compare the utility and cost-effectiveness of the ACR-1997, SLICC-2012, and ACR/EULAR-2019 classification criteria in children with suspected cSLE.

METHODS

We prospectively included subjects aged ≤17 who presented to the Immunology Department with suspected cSLE and consented to participate in the study. Exclusion criteria were pregnancy, tuberculosis, immunosuppressive therapy, malignancies, or insufficient data to apply the classification criteria. The ACR-1997, SLICC-2012, and ACR/EULAR-2019 lupus criteria were applied, followed by a referral for expert consensus diagnosis, which served as the standard of reference. We calculated the classification performance (how well a set of classification criteria assigns an individual to SLE or no-cSLE, measuring sensitivity, specificity, among others), direct healthcare costs for each classification, and developed a decision tree and quadrant graph for economic evaluation.

RESULTS

Ninety-six subjects (83% female) with a median age of 13.5 years were included in this study. The expert consensus diagnosis identified cSLE in 43 subjects; ACR and ACR/EULAR each identified 42 cases, while SLICC identified 56. The sensitivity was 98% for SLICC-2012, 84% for ACR-1997, and ACR/EULAR-2019, p = 0.000). The cost per subject per classification was USD 287.62 for SLICC-2012, USD 174.97 for ACR-1997, and USD 310.36 for ACR/EULAR-2019 (p = 0.596).

CONCLUSION

The SLICC-2012 criteria were the most sensitive for the classification of SLE, but not the most cost-effective. ACR-1997 remains the most cost-effective tool in specialized settings; however, the higher sensitivity of SLICC-2012 supports its use to improve early referral.

Для цитирования: Rodríguez-Lozano Ana Luisa, González-Garay Alejandro Gabriel, Villasis-Keever Miguel Ángel, Nájera-Velázquez Ruth G, Sáez-de-Ocariz Marimar, Scheffler-Mendoza Selma Cecilia, Rivas-Larrauri Francisco Eduardo, Yamazaki-Nakashimada Marco Antonio, García-De La Puente Silvestre. Evaluation of the classification performance and cost-effectiveness of classification criteria in children with systemic lupus erythematosus.. Frontiers in pediatrics. 2026. DOI: 10.3389/fped.2026.1745252.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.