MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/prca.200600497

Медицинская библиотека · Proteomics. Clinical applications · 2007

Proteomic analysis of autoantigens associated with systemic lupus erythematosus: Anti-aldolase A antibody as a potential marker of lupus nephritis.

Serada Satoshi, Fujimoto Minoru, Takahashi Tsuyoshi, He Ping, Hayashi Akio, Tanaka Toshio, Hagihara Keisuke, Yamadori Tomoki, Mochizuki Masao, Norioka Naoko, Norioka Shigemi, Kawase Ichiro, Naka Tetsuji

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

To screen for autoantibodies associated with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), we used proteomic approaches combining 2-D PAGE and Western blot analysis, followed by protein identification by LC-MS/MS analysis, resulting in the identification of aldolase A as a novel autoantigen in SLE. ELISA showed the prevalence of anti-aldolase A antibodies to be 29.3% in SLE, 8.2% in rheumatoid arthritis, 18.1% in polymyositis and absent in healthy controls. Furthermore, 43.4% of SLE patients suffering from nephritis showed anti-aldolase A autoantibodies, which was significantly higher than the prevalence for those without nephritis (11.1%). In lupus nephritis, there are few reliable diagnostic methods, other than urinalysis. Therefore, these results indicate that autoantibodies against aldolase A may serve as an alternative clinical biomarker of SLE associated with nephritis.

Для цитирования: Serada Satoshi, Fujimoto Minoru, Takahashi Tsuyoshi, He Ping, Hayashi Akio, Tanaka Toshio, Hagihara Keisuke, Yamadori Tomoki, Mochizuki Masao, Norioka Naoko, Norioka Shigemi, Kawase Ichiro, Naka Tetsuji. Proteomic analysis of autoantigens associated with systemic lupus erythematosus: Anti-aldolase A antibody as a potential marker of lupus nephritis.. Proteomics. Clinical applications. 2007. DOI: 10.1002/prca.200600497.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.