Differential diagnostics of polymyalgia rheumatica in a university hospital in Finland.

OBJECTIVES

Diagnosing polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) can be difficult as many conditions present with similar symptoms and findings. This study aimed to analyse how often the diagnosis of PMR changes during follow-up in a university hospital setting and to determine the most common clinical conditions initially misdiagnosed as PMR.

METHOD: All patients with a new primary diagnosis of PMR on at least one visit during the years 2016-2019 were identified from the hospital discharge register of Turku University Hospital, Finland. A diagnosis of PMR was confirmed if the patient met at least one of the five classification criteria, complete clinical follow-up (median 34 months) was compatible with PMR, and no other diagnosis better explained their condition.

RESULTS

Of the patients initially diagnosed with PMR, 65.5% were considered to have PMR after further evaluation and clinical follow-up. The most common conditions initially diagnosed as PMR were inflammatory arthritides (34.9%), degenerative or stress-related musculoskeletal disorders (13.2%), infection (9.3%), malignancy (9.3%), giant cell vasculitis (6.2%) and other vasculitis (6.2%), and a wide range of other less common diseases. The diagnosis of PMR remained in 81.3% of patients who fulfilled the 2012 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism PMR classification criteria and in 45.5% of patients who did not.

CONCLUSIONS

Diagnosing PMR is challenging, even in a university hospital. One-third of the initial diagnoses of PMR changed during further evaluation and follow-up. There is a substantial risk of misdiagnosis, especially in patients with atypical presentation, and the differential diagnoses of PMR must be considered carefully.