International journal of pediatrics & adolescent medicine · 2020
New or vanishing frontiers: LACC1-associated juvenile arthritis.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Al-Mayouf Sulaiman M, Yateem Mada, Al-Dusery Haya, Monies Dorota, Wakil Salma, AlShiakh Manal, AlEnazi Abdullatif, Aladaileh Boshra, Alzyoud Raed, Meyer Brian
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The classification and pathogenic basis of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) are a subject of some controversy. Essentially, JIA is an exclusion diagnosis that represents a phenotypically heterogeneous group of arthritis of unknown origin. Familial aggregation of JIA supports the concept of genetic influence in the pathogenesis of JIA.
OBJECTIVE: To present the spectrum of laccase domain-containing 1 (LACC1)-associated juvenile arthritis with clinical, biochemical, and molecular genetic data of a cohort of 43 patients, including 11 previously unpublished cases.
METHODS: We studied 11 patients with different categories of juvenile idiopathic arthritis from 5 consanguineous families, all from Saudi Arabia, except 2 patients who were of Jordanian ethnicity. Whole-exome sequencing was used to identify the disease-causing variant of LACC1. We also reviewed the clinical spectrum and molecular genetic data of previously published cases of LACC1-associated juvenile arthritis.
RESULTS: This study describes 43 (29 females, 14 males) patients from consanguineous multiplex families. Most of the included patients were of Arab origin with 86% having early onset disease. The most frequent categories were systemic (19 patients) and rheumatoid factor-negative polyarticular (19 patients). Thirty-seven (86%) had progressive erosive arthritis and 10 (23.3%) had persistent limb lymphedema. None of the patients had features of macrophage activation syndrome. Genetic analysis confirmed LACC1 variant in all patients; 22 patients had common founder mutation (LACC1: c.850T > C,p.C284R), while the others showed different LACC1 variants. All patients were treated aggressively with methotrexate and sequential biologic agents. Most of them showed a poor response to treatment.
CONCLUSION: This report expands the pathogenic variants of LACC1 and the clinical spectrum associated with this genetic subset of juvenile arthritis. The predominance of autosomal-recessive inheritance and strong genetic evidence allowed us to propose LACC1-associated juvenile arthritis as a distinct disorder.
OBJECTIVE: To present the spectrum of laccase domain-containing 1 (LACC1)-associated juvenile arthritis with clinical, biochemical, and molecular genetic data of a cohort of 43 patients, including 11 previously unpublished cases.
METHODS: We studied 11 patients with different categories of juvenile idiopathic arthritis from 5 consanguineous families, all from Saudi Arabia, except 2 patients who were of Jordanian ethnicity. Whole-exome sequencing was used to identify the disease-causing variant of LACC1. We also reviewed the clinical spectrum and molecular genetic data of previously published cases of LACC1-associated juvenile arthritis.
RESULTS: This study describes 43 (29 females, 14 males) patients from consanguineous multiplex families. Most of the included patients were of Arab origin with 86% having early onset disease. The most frequent categories were systemic (19 patients) and rheumatoid factor-negative polyarticular (19 patients). Thirty-seven (86%) had progressive erosive arthritis and 10 (23.3%) had persistent limb lymphedema. None of the patients had features of macrophage activation syndrome. Genetic analysis confirmed LACC1 variant in all patients; 22 patients had common founder mutation (LACC1: c.850T > C,p.C284R), while the others showed different LACC1 variants. All patients were treated aggressively with methotrexate and sequential biologic agents. Most of them showed a poor response to treatment.
CONCLUSION: This report expands the pathogenic variants of LACC1 and the clinical spectrum associated with this genetic subset of juvenile arthritis. The predominance of autosomal-recessive inheritance and strong genetic evidence allowed us to propose LACC1-associated juvenile arthritis as a distinct disorder.