MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.ijscr.2020.04.020

Медицинская библиотека · International journal of surgery case reports · 2020

Multiple bilateral trigger fingers in a child with neurofibromatosis type I following an acute viral infection: A case report.

Al-Qattan Mohammad M, AlMarshad Felwa A, Ijaz Attiya, Shah Mardan Qutaiba

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

Triggering of the fingers in children is an uncommon entity. A review of the literature on the topic did not reveal any reports of multiple triggering in patients with neurofibromatosis.

CASE REPORT: Our patient is a known case of neurofibromatosis type I (NF 1). At the age of 4 years, the child required chemotherapy to treat symptomatic bilateral optic glioma. Chemotherapy was complicated by severe viral upper respiratory tract infection with concurrent multi-joint synovitis and mild triggering of the fingers. A second course of chemotherapy was required 2 years later. This was also complicated by a viral infection, joint synovitis, and worsening of the triggering. Surgical release of the A1 and part of the A2 pulleys was curative.

DISCUSSION: Two factors contributed to the development of multiple triggering in our pediatric patient. The NF 1 itself predisposes to fibrosis. The second factor is the synovitis that accompanied the acute viral infection.

CONCLUSION

We report on a case of multiple bilateral trigger fingers in a child with NF 1 following an acute viral infection and discuss the pathogenesis.

Для цитирования: Al-Qattan Mohammad M, AlMarshad Felwa A, Ijaz Attiya, Shah Mardan Qutaiba. Multiple bilateral trigger fingers in a child with neurofibromatosis type I following an acute viral infection: A case report.. International journal of surgery case reports. 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2020.04.020.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.