Medical engineering & physics · 2024
Bone ingrowth in randomly distributed porous interbody cage during lumbar spinal fusion.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Talukdar Rahul Gautam, Dhara Santanu, Gupta Sanjay
Аннотация
Porous interbody cages are often used in spinal fusion surgery since they allow bone ingrowth which facilitates long-term stability. However, the extent of bone ingrowth in and around porous interbody cages has scarcely been investigated. Moreover, tissue differentiation might not be similar around the superior and inferior cage-bone interfaces. Using mechanobiology-based numerical framework and physiologic loading conditions, the study investigates the spatial distribution of evolutionary bone ingrowth within randomly distributed porous interbody cages, having varied porosities. Finite Element (FE) microscale models, corresponding to cage porosities of 60 %, 72 %, and 83 %, were developed for the superior and inferior interfacial regions of the cage, along with the macroscale model of the implanted lumbar spine. The implant-bone relative displacements of different porosity models were mapped from macroscale to microscale model. Bone formation of 10-40 % was predicted across the porous cage models, resulting in an average Young's modulus ranging between 765 MPa and 915 MPa. Maximum bone ingrowth of ∼34 % was observed for the 83 % porous cage, which was subject to low implant-bone relative displacements (maximum 50μm). New bone formation was found to be greater at the superior interface (∼34 %) as compared to the inferior interface (∼30 %) for P83 model. Relatively greater volume of fibrous tissue was formed at the implant-bone interface for the cage with 60 % and 72 % porosities, which might lead to cage migration and eventual failure of the implant. Hence, the interbody cage with 83 % porosity appears to be most favorable for bone ingrowth, provided sufficient mechanical strength is offered.