MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/bot.0000000000002966

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of orthopaedic trauma · 2025

Posterior Plating Versus Anterior to Posterior Screws in Fixation of Posterior Column in Pilon Fractures.

Baraka Mostafa M, Fayyad Tamer A, Thakeb Mootaz F, Lamei Mina A, Al Kersh Mohamed A

СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

To compare the results of anterior to posterior screws (AP screws) versus posterior buttress plating in the fixation of posterior column fractures in pilon injuries regarding the (1) functional and (2) radiological outcomes and (3) the incidence of complications.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized clinical trial.

SETTING

Single Center, Level 1 trauma Center.

PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA: All patients with 2-, 3-, and 4-column fracture according to the 4-column classification (orthopedic trauma association/Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen 43-C1 and 43-C2) during the study period were eligible for inclusion. Patients were randomized into 2 groups: direct reduction and fixation by posterior buttress plating (group A) and indirect reduction with fixation by AP screws (group B). Exclusion criteria included pediatric age group with open physis, pathological fractures, open fractures, and fractures with neurovascular injuries. The minimum follow-up period was 24 months.

OUTCOME MEASURES AND COMPARISONS: The primary outcome was the quality of reduction as evaluated using postoperative plain radiographs and computed tomography. Secondary outcomes included the functional American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score and the incidence of complications.

RESULTS

Thirty patients were included, 15 patients were randomized to group A [mean age 42.3 (range 19-65)] and 15 patients in group B [mean age 38.0 in group B (range 23-58)]. The mean follow-up was 32 months (24-45 months). Anatomical reduction was achieved in 80% and 26.7% of group A and group B, respectively. The AOFAS score was significantly higher in group A compared with group B ( P = 0.03). There was no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups regarding the time to union and the complication rates ( P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

A higher percentage of anatomical reduction was associated with direct reduction and posterior buttress plating compared with indirect reduction and AP screws. This was reflected by a significantly higher AOFAS score.Clinical Trials Registration Number: NCT05303389.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Для цитирования: Baraka Mostafa M, Fayyad Tamer A, Thakeb Mootaz F, Lamei Mina A, Al Kersh Mohamed A. Posterior Plating Versus Anterior to Posterior Screws in Fixation of Posterior Column in Pilon Fractures.. Journal of orthopaedic trauma. 2025. DOI: 10.1097/bot.0000000000002966.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.