MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.arth.2025.04.049

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of arthroplasty · 2025

Perioperative Use of Bisphosphonate and Implant Survival After Total Joint Arthroplasty.

Lin Yiyun, Gao Jie, Zheng Huayong, Zhang Zhicheng, Sun Tiansheng

СтатьяМетаанализСистематический обзорПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to explore the relationship between perioperative bisphosphonate (BP) use and implant survival in total joint arthroplasty (TJA).

METHODS

Literature in PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library was systematically searched until May 2024, and studies were reviewed. Eligible studies are randomized controlled trials or cohort studies comparing BP with placebo or antiosteoporosis agents in TJA, reporting implant survival outcomes with full-text availability. The search identified 2,051 potentially relevant publications; 20 met the selection criteria.

RESULTS

Our results revealed that perioperative BP use significantly reduced the incidence of all-cause revision surgery (ARS) after TJA (RR [risk ratio] 0.67 [95% CI (confidence interval) 0.54 to 0.83], P = 0.003). Preoperative BP use significantly increased the risk of developing ARS (RR 0.72 [95% CI 0.54 to 0.95], P < 0.00001) and periprosthetic fracture (PPF) (RR 1.33 [95% CI 1.21 to 1.46], P < 0.00001) after TJA. However, BP initiated after TJA reduced the risk of ARS (RR 0.57 [95% CI 0.43 to 0.74], P < 0.00001). In addition, perioperative BP use for at least six months was associated with a lower risk of ARS (RR 0.83 [95% CI 0.77 to 0.89], P < 0.00001), but a higher risk of PPF in patients who had TJA (RR 1.28 [95% CI 1.16 to 1.42], P = 0.0002). When initiated after total hip arthroplasty (THA), BP was associated with a lower incidence of PPF (RR 0.55 [95% CI 0.31 to 0.98], P = 0.04), and there was an increased risk of ARS following THA if perioperative BP was used for over one year (RR 1.10 [95% CI 1.01 to 1.21], P = 0.03). At last, perioperative BP use had no effect on aseptic loosening, periprosthetic joint infection, osteolysis, stress fracture, adverse events, or mortality after TJA.

CONCLUSIONS

Perioperative BP use significantly reduced the incidence of ARS after TJA. Preoperative use of BP significantly increased the risk of developing ARS and PPF after TJA. However, BP initiated after TJA reduced the risk of ARS, but had no effect on PPF. In addition, perioperative BP use for at least six months was associated with a lower risk of ARS, but a higher risk of PPF in patients who had TJA.

Для цитирования: Lin Yiyun, Gao Jie, Zheng Huayong, Zhang Zhicheng, Sun Tiansheng. Perioperative Use of Bisphosphonate and Implant Survival After Total Joint Arthroplasty.. The Journal of arthroplasty. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2025.04.049.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.