European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2024
Robotic assistance for upper cervical instrumentation: report on accuracy and safety.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Luo Kaihang, Zou Xuenong, Chen Wei, Cui Shangbin, Liu Shaoyu, Chen Liuyun, Zhou Lin
Аннотация
PURPOSE: This study aims to evaluate the accuracy and safety of C1 lateral mass and upper cervical pedicle screw placement assisted by the TiRobot II system.
METHODS: Ten patients who underwent cervical spine surgery assisted by the TiRobot II system were included. Screw accuracy was assessed using the Gertzbein-Robbins scale and by comparing the final screw positions with pre-planned trajectories. Deviations in screw tip, tail, and angle were recorded. Clinical data, including symptoms, surgical outcomes, and postoperative follow-up, were collected. Neurological improvement was evaluated using pre- and post-operative mJOA scores, with recovery rates calculated by Hirabayashi's method to assess outcomes 3 months after surgery.
RESULTS: A total of 30 screws were placed in 10 patients. All screws (30/30) were within the clinically acceptable range, with 93.33% (28 screws) classified as Grade A and 6.67% (2 screws) as Grade B. In the sagittal plane, the average tip deviation was 1.82 ± 0.79 mm, tail deviation 1.64 ± 0.60 mm, and angular deviation 1.92 ± 1.39°. In the axial plane, tip deviation was 1.96 ± 0.87 mm, tail deviation 1.92 ± 0.65 mm, and angular deviation 2.01 ± 1.07°. The average surgery time was 318.80 ± 66.07 min, with a mean EBL of 205.00 ± 55.03 mL. Postoperative mJOA scores significantly improved from 8.10 ± 1.97 to 12.60 ± 1.78 (p < 0.05), with a 52 ± 14% recovery rate. All patients showed significant symptom improvement.
CONCLUSION: The TiRobot II system demonstrates the capability to precisely execute pre-planned trajectories and improves the accuracy and safety of C1 lateral mass and upper cervical screw placement.
METHODS: Ten patients who underwent cervical spine surgery assisted by the TiRobot II system were included. Screw accuracy was assessed using the Gertzbein-Robbins scale and by comparing the final screw positions with pre-planned trajectories. Deviations in screw tip, tail, and angle were recorded. Clinical data, including symptoms, surgical outcomes, and postoperative follow-up, were collected. Neurological improvement was evaluated using pre- and post-operative mJOA scores, with recovery rates calculated by Hirabayashi's method to assess outcomes 3 months after surgery.
RESULTS: A total of 30 screws were placed in 10 patients. All screws (30/30) were within the clinically acceptable range, with 93.33% (28 screws) classified as Grade A and 6.67% (2 screws) as Grade B. In the sagittal plane, the average tip deviation was 1.82 ± 0.79 mm, tail deviation 1.64 ± 0.60 mm, and angular deviation 1.92 ± 1.39°. In the axial plane, tip deviation was 1.96 ± 0.87 mm, tail deviation 1.92 ± 0.65 mm, and angular deviation 2.01 ± 1.07°. The average surgery time was 318.80 ± 66.07 min, with a mean EBL of 205.00 ± 55.03 mL. Postoperative mJOA scores significantly improved from 8.10 ± 1.97 to 12.60 ± 1.78 (p < 0.05), with a 52 ± 14% recovery rate. All patients showed significant symptom improvement.
CONCLUSION: The TiRobot II system demonstrates the capability to precisely execute pre-planned trajectories and improves the accuracy and safety of C1 lateral mass and upper cervical screw placement.