Spine · 2024
Lumbar Fusion Surgical Prophylaxis Using Cefazolin Versus Vancomycin in the Penicillin-Allergic Patient.
СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Carter Michael, Narayanan Rajkishen, Toci Gregory, Huang Rachel, Dalton Jonathan, Tomlak Alexa, Lee Yunsoo, Mumtaz Shiraz, Sabitsky Matthew, Pasha Asad, Vanichkachorn Andrew, Kim Andrew, Syal Amit, Kurd Mark, Kaye Ian D, Canseco Jose, Hilibrand Alan, Vaccaro Alexander, Schroeder Gregory, Kepler Christopher
Аннотация
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study.
OBJECTIVE: To compare perioperative and postoperative infection rates among patients with mild to moderate penicillin allergies who receive cefazolin versus vancomycin as prophylaxis for lumbar fusion. In addition, we sought to determine if patients receiving cefazolin exhibited any clinical symptoms suggestive of drug-induced hypersensitivity reactions, and to compare those rates to patients who received vancomycin.
SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Cefazolin has been historically linked to hypersensitivity reactions in penicillin-allergic patients due to cross-reactivity. As a result, vancomycin is often given to these patients instead. To our knowledge, no studies have directly compared these two antibiotics in penicillin-allergic patients undergoing lumbar fusion.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with mild to moderate documented penicillin allergies who underwent lumbar fusion from 2017 to 2022 and received prophylactic cefazolin or vancomycin were studied. Demographic, surgical information, and hospital length of stay (LOS) were recorded. We identified drug sensitivity reactions, in hospital infections, 90-day readmissions related to infectious etiologies and need for irrigation and debridement (I&D) to treat a surgical site infection.
RESULTS: Two hundred twenty-two patients received cefazolin, while 180 received vancomycin. Patients receiving vancomycin had more medical comorbidities, while patients receiving cefazolin had slightly more levels fused. No significant differences existed between cohorts in postoperative infection rate. One patient given cefazolin developed a mild drug-induced skin reaction that was treated with topical steroids. No significant differences existed between cohorts in 90-day readmissions or need for I&D surgery. On bivariate analysis, patients given cefazolin had a longer LOS but this was attributed to confounding variables on multivariate analysis.
CONCLUSIONS: Cefazolin and vancomycin are comparable at preventing postoperative infections among patients with mild to moderate documented reactions to penicillin. Our findings also suggest that penicillin-allergic patients are not at higher risk of developing drug-related hypersensitivity reactions in response to cefazolin exposure when compared with those who received vancomycin.
OBJECTIVE: To compare perioperative and postoperative infection rates among patients with mild to moderate penicillin allergies who receive cefazolin versus vancomycin as prophylaxis for lumbar fusion. In addition, we sought to determine if patients receiving cefazolin exhibited any clinical symptoms suggestive of drug-induced hypersensitivity reactions, and to compare those rates to patients who received vancomycin.
SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Cefazolin has been historically linked to hypersensitivity reactions in penicillin-allergic patients due to cross-reactivity. As a result, vancomycin is often given to these patients instead. To our knowledge, no studies have directly compared these two antibiotics in penicillin-allergic patients undergoing lumbar fusion.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with mild to moderate documented penicillin allergies who underwent lumbar fusion from 2017 to 2022 and received prophylactic cefazolin or vancomycin were studied. Demographic, surgical information, and hospital length of stay (LOS) were recorded. We identified drug sensitivity reactions, in hospital infections, 90-day readmissions related to infectious etiologies and need for irrigation and debridement (I&D) to treat a surgical site infection.
RESULTS: Two hundred twenty-two patients received cefazolin, while 180 received vancomycin. Patients receiving vancomycin had more medical comorbidities, while patients receiving cefazolin had slightly more levels fused. No significant differences existed between cohorts in postoperative infection rate. One patient given cefazolin developed a mild drug-induced skin reaction that was treated with topical steroids. No significant differences existed between cohorts in 90-day readmissions or need for I&D surgery. On bivariate analysis, patients given cefazolin had a longer LOS but this was attributed to confounding variables on multivariate analysis.
CONCLUSIONS: Cefazolin and vancomycin are comparable at preventing postoperative infections among patients with mild to moderate documented reactions to penicillin. Our findings also suggest that penicillin-allergic patients are not at higher risk of developing drug-related hypersensitivity reactions in response to cefazolin exposure when compared with those who received vancomycin.