Background
Bisphosphonates (BPs) are stable analogs of pyrophosphate [ 1 ]. BPs are widely used in clinical practice for the prevention and treatment of bone metabolism-related diseases such as osteoporosis, multiple myeloma, osteitis deformans, bone metastases from malignant tumors, and tumor-derived hypercalcemia [ 2 ]. BPs inhibit the destruction of bone and control the bone metastasis of malignant tumors [ 3 ]. However, the deposition of BPs in bone cannot be completely metabolized [ 4 ]. Osteonecrosis of the jaw associated with BPs can occur many years later due to trauma, tooth extraction, etc. [ 5 ]. Therefore, the number of patients with BPs-related osteonecrosis of the jaw and patients with potential osteonecrosis risk is huge [ 6 ].
Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) is a rare clinical disease that mainly occurs in patients with osteoporosis, bone metastases and other bone-destructive diseases who receive bisphosphonate therapy [ 7 , 8 ]. The pathogenesis of MRONJ remains unclear [ 9 ]. Accumulating evidence has demonstrated that MRONJ may be associated with imbalances in bone remodeling, inhibition of angiogenesis, inflammatory response to infection, and soft tissue toxicity [ 9 , 10 ]. Most of the current research shows that the treatment plan of MRONJ should comprehensively consider the disease stage and the patient's systemic condition [ 11 ]. Perioperative use of antibacterial mouthwash and systemic antibiotic therapy are effective measures to prevent the occurrence of MRONJ after tooth extraction [ 12 ].
Semaphorins are a newly discovered family of proteins with common domains that are widely present in organisms [ 13 ]. They have attracted widespread attention due to their bidirectional regulation of osteoclasts and osteoblasts [ 14 ]. It has been reported that some sema family proteins and their receptors are involved in the regulation of bone remodeling [ 15 ]. Semaphorin 4D (Sema4D) directly or indirectly affects the expression, differentiation and migration of osteoblasts and osteoclasts, thereby inhibiting or promoting the process of bone remodeling [ 16 ]. Sema4D expression is increased in canonical receptor activator of nuclear kappa-B (RANKL)-mediated osteoclast differentiation [ 17 ]. It was found that Sema4D protein expression was significantly reduced in MRONJ model tissues by immunohistochemical staining in animal models [ 13 ].
In order to further verify the clinical value of Sema4D in MRONJ and provide a basis for early warning and diagnosis of MRONJ, we study the clinical significance of Sema4D in the early diagnosis of MRONJ in this work.
Methods
Study design
A total of 153 patients who had currently on treatment with oral bisphosphonates for more than 2 years or had received at least two intravenous bisphosphonate injections were preparing for dentoalveolar surgery. Eight patients declined to participate in the study, 28 patients were experiencing MRONJ, 13 patients had previous MRONJ, and 7 patients were excluded for other reasons. Therefore, 97 patients at risk for MRONJ were included. After 12 weeks of follow-up, 55 patients had no confirmed MRONJ to the follow-up endpoint, and 42 patients had confirmed MRONJ. The time point at which patients at risk for MRONJ were included in the study was defined as T0. The time point of the study endpoint after the end of 12-month follow-up was defined as T1. In addition, we selected 45 healthy patients to detect serum Sema4D levels at T0 and T1 time points (Fig. 1 ). The study was approved by the ethics committee of Cangzhou Central Hospital (#2021-189-02(Z)), and the participants signed written informed consent. Fig. 1 Study design

MRONJ diagnosis
Diagnostic criteria for MRONJ: current or previous history of bisphosphonate therapy; osteonecrosis of the jaw for more than 8 weeks without improvement; no history of radiotherapy to the head and neck. Patients meeting the above three conditions at the same time can be diagnosed as MRONJ.
Staging of MRONJ
MRONJ is divided into risk period, stage 0, stage 1, stage 2 and stage 3 clinically. Patients at risk of MRONJ were asymptomatic and without osteonecrosis. Patients with MRONJ stage 0 mainly present with no osteonecrosis or bone exposure, and only non-specific symptoms. Patients with MRONJ stage 1 mainly present with osteonecrosis or bone exposure, without clinical symptoms and signs of infection. Patients with MRONJ stage 2 had osteonecrosis or bone exposure with focal infection. Patients with MRONJ stage 3 have osteonecrosis or exposed bone with painful infection. In addition, stage 3 MRONJ should also include one or more of the following manifestations: pathological fracture, extraoral fistula, and jaw with lesions beyond the alveolar bone.
Participants
All participants in this study received elective dentoalveolar surgery in our hospital, including frenulum correction, alveolar bone revision, and oro-antral fistula repair. Inclusion criteria: (1) Patients who underwent alveolar surgery in our hospital; (2) Patients who received oral BPs for at least 2 years or at least two intravenous injections of BPs; (3) No head and neck radiation therapy; (4) Patients without jaw metastatic disease. Exclusion criteria: (1) Patients who already suffered from MRONJ at the time of recruitment. (2) Patients with current evidence of MRONJ (exposed bone or bone that can be explored through the formation of intraoral or extraoral fistulas in the maxillofacial region); (3) Patients with serious cardiovascular and cerebrovascular and systemic diseases, allergies, and mental illnesses.
The 97 patients at risk for MRONJ were included in this study. After 12 weeks of follow-up, 55 patients had no confirmed MRONJ to the follow-up endpoint, and 42 patients had confirmed MRONJ. Therefore, they were divided into non-MRONJ group (n = 55) and MRONJ group (n = 42). In addition, we also recruited 45 healthy people without MRONJ risk as a healthy control group (n = 45).
Intervention
In order to detect the concentration of Sema4D in the serum of different patients in different periods, we collected 5 mL of fasting peripheral venous blood from each patient at T0 and T1 time points respectively. Patients were asked to fast for eight hours before the blood collection, which took place from 6:00 am to 9:00 am. The blood collection process was completed by experienced nurses using vacuum blood collection tubes according to the hospital's blood collection procedures. Each patient was required to have two tubes of blood collected at each blood draw for research and storage. Blood collected was centrifuged at 3,000 g for 10 min to obtain patient serum immediately on the same day and stored at −80 °C. Sema4D concentrations were assessed using an enzyme-labeled immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit (Xinle Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) according to the instructions.
Statistical analysis
SPSS 19.0 software was used to perform χ2 test for categorical variables and t test for continuous variables. The Mann–Whitney test or Kruskal–Wallis test was used to analyze Sema4D levels in serum of MRONJ patients at different time points. Statistically significant differences were indicated by *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.
Results
Demographic and clinical characteristics of patients
The demographic and clinical characteristics of 97 patients who received dentoalveolar surgery were shown in Table 1 . A total of 42 of the 97 patients were diagnosed with MRONJ, and the other 55 served as non-MRONJ controls. There were no significant differences in their basic characteristics, including gender, age, duration of BPs use, types of BPs used, and types of surgery. The two groups of patients had osteoporosis and bone metastasis before the use of BPs, and there was no significant difference in the number of patients. In patients in the MRONJ group, the sites of osteonecrosis included the mandible (66.7%), the maxilla (26.2%), and the mandible and maxilla (7.1%). MRONJ grades include stage I (35.7%), stage II (45.2%) and stage III (19.1%). Table 1 Demographic and clinical characteristics of patients received dentoalveolar surgery (n = 97) Characteristics Study group p Non-MRONJ (n = 55) MRONJ (n = 42) Gender Male 21 (38.2%) 14 (33.3%) 0.674 Female 34 (61.8%) 28 (66.7%) Age (years) 65.4 ± 9.6 68.7 ± 10.7 0.108 Duration of bisphosphonate exposure (months) 44.2 ± 27.8 51.1 ± 32.5 0.223 Indication for bisphosphonate treatment Osteoporosis 36 (65.5%) 30 (71.4%) 0.661 Bone metastasis 19 (34.5%) 12 (28.6%) Administration route IV 20 (36.4%) 22 (52.4%) 0.149 PO 35 (63.6%) 20 (47.6%) Bisphosphonates use Alendronate 12 (21.8%) 8 (19%) 0.212 Pamidronate 3 (5.5%) 1 (2.4%) Ibandronate 16 (29.1%) 16 (38.1%) Zoledronate 22 (40%) 11 (26.2%) Risedronate 2 (3.6%) 6 (14.3%) Dentoalveolar surgery Tooth extraction 36 (65.5%) 25 (59.5%) 0.765 Dental prosthesis 11 (20%) 11 (26.2%) Root cannel procedure 8 (14.5%) 6 (14.3%) Location Mandible – 28 (66.7%) – Maxilla 11 (26.2%) Mandible and maxilla 3 (7.1%) Stage I – 15 (35.7%) – II 19 (45.2%) III 8 (19.1%) Values were expressed as n (percentage, %) or mean ± SD. p values for each group were derived from Mann–Whitney test. Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test was used for assessing distribution of observations or phenomena between two groups
Table 1
Demographic and clinical characteristics of patients received dentoalveolar surgery (n = 97)
Values were expressed as n (percentage, %) or mean ± SD. p values for each group were derived from Mann–Whitney test. Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test was used for assessing distribution of observations or phenomena between two groups
| Characteristics | Study group | p | |
| Non-MRONJ (n = 55) | MRONJ (n = 42) | ||
| Gender | |||
| Male | 21 (38.2%) | 14 (33.3%) | 0.674 |
| Female | 34 (61.8%) | 28 (66.7%) | |
| Age (years) | 65.4 ± 9.6 | 68.7 ± 10.7 | 0.108 |
| Duration of bisphosphonate exposure (months) | 44.2 ± 27.8 | 51.1 ± 32.5 | 0.223 |
| Indication for bisphosphonate treatment | |||
| Osteoporosis | 36 (65.5%) | 30 (71.4%) | 0.661 |
| Bone metastasis | 19 (34.5%) | 12 (28.6%) | |
| Administration route | |||
| IV | 20 (36.4%) | 22 (52.4%) | 0.149 |
| PO | 35 (63.6%) | 20 (47.6%) | |
| Bisphosphonates use | |||
| Alendronate | 12 (21.8%) | 8 (19%) | 0.212 |
| Pamidronate | 3 (5.5%) | 1 (2.4%) | |
| Ibandronate | 16 (29.1%) | 16 (38.1%) | |
| Zoledronate | 22 (40%) | 11 (26.2%) | |
| Risedronate | 2 (3.6%) | 6 (14.3%) | |
| Dentoalveolar surgery | |||
| Tooth extraction | 36 (65.5%) | 25 (59.5%) | 0.765 |
| Dental prosthesis | 11 (20%) | 11 (26.2%) | |
| Root cannel procedure | 8 (14.5%) | 6 (14.3%) | |
| Location | |||
| Mandible | – | 28 (66.7%) | – |
| Maxilla | 11 (26.2%) | ||
| Mandible and maxilla | 3 (7.1%) | ||
| Stage | |||
| I | – | 15 (35.7%) | – |
| II | 19 (45.2%) | ||
| III | 8 (19.1%) |
Serum Sema4D among different groups
To further analyze the relationship between the onset of MRONJ and the level of Sema4D in serum, we compared serum Sema4D among healthy control, non-MRONJ and MRONJ at enrollment (T0, Fig. 2 A) and diagnosis (T1, Fig. 2 B) using Kruskal–Wallis test. As shown in Fig. 2 A, the serum Sema4D of patients in the non-MRONJ group was significantly lower than that in the healthy group (p < 0.05). In addition, the Sema4D levels of patients in the MRONJ group were also significantly lower than those in the non-MRONJ group (p < 0.01). As shown in Fig. 2 B, the Sema4D level of patients in MRONJ group was significantly lower than that in non-MRONJ group patients after diagnosis in MRONJ group patients, and the difference between the two groups was more significant (p < 0.001). Fig. 2 Comparison of serum Sema4D among healthy control, non-MRONJ and MRONJ at enrollment (T0, A ) and diagnosis (T1, B .) Data were presented with median (IQR). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. Kruskal–Wallis test followed by Dunn's multiple comparisons test

ROC analysis of serum Sema4D for the prediction and diagnosis of MRONJ
To further analyze the predictive ability of Sema4D for the onset of MRONJ, we used ROC analysis to analyze serum Sema4D for the prediction (Fig. 3 A) and diagnosis (Fig. 3 B) of MRONJ among patients with the risk of osteonecrosis of the jaw at T0 and T1. For Sema4D at T0, the cut off value was 11.83 ng/ml, the sensitivity was 78.57%, the specificity was 65.45% and the AUC was 0.72 (p < 0.001, Fig. 3 A). For Sema4D at T1, the cut off value was 6.57 ng/ml, the sensitivity was 71.43%, the specificity was 85.45% and the AUC was 0.85 (p < 0.001, Fig. 3 B). Fig. 3 ROC analysis of serum Sema4D for the prediction A and diagnosis B of MRONJ among patients with the risk of osteonecrosis of the jaw

Serum Sema4D in MRONJ patients with different stages and different routes of BPs administrations
To further analyze the relationship between Sema4D and MRONJ, we compared serum Sema4D in MRONJ patients with different stages (Fig. 4 A) and different routes of bisphosphonate administrations (Fig. 4 B). There were significant differences in serum Sema4D levels in patients with grade III MRONJ with increasing disease severity, and there was no significant difference between stage I and II (Fig. 4 A). On the other hand, the serum Sema4D level of the intravenous BPs was significantly lower than that of the oral BPs (Fig. 4 B). Fig. 4 Comparison of serum Sema4D in MRONJ patients with different stage ( A ) and different routes of bisphosphonate administrations ( B ). Data were presented with median (IQR). *p < 0.05. Mann–Whitney test and Kruskal–Wallis test

Discussion
BPs have been discovered since the 1970s and have been widely used in clinic [ 18 ]. BPs were mainly used in clinic to treat osteoporosis and Paget's disease and control the bone metastasis of malignant tumors by inhibiting the function of osteoclasts [ 19 ]. BPs mainly affect the formation and activation of osteoclasts by down-regulating the transduction of RhoA signaling channel, and further affecting the cytoskeleton and other structures and the migration of intracellular vesicles [ 20 ]. Third-generation BPs, including zoledronic acid and ibandronate, are more resistant to bone resorption [ 21 ]. The incidence of adverse reactions of third-generation BPs was significantly lower than that of first- and second-generation BPs [ 22 ]. Therefore, now the third generation BPs have been widely used in clinical treatment. Clinical studies have shown that BPs have a very good therapeutic effect on the treatment of bone resorption diseases and the control of bone metastasis [ 23 , 24 ]. However, it has been found in long-term applications that even the improved third-generation drugs still have a certain degree of adverse reactions and side effects, such as acute phase reactions (gastrointestinal reactions, skin symptoms, etc.) that can appear in a short period of time [ 22 ]. More importantly, long-term use of BPs can lead to severe skeletal sequelae, mainly including MRONJ, atypical femoral fractures, and skeletal muscle pain, which seriously affect the long-term quality of life of patients [ 25 ].
MRONJ is a rare benign lesion of the jaw in oral and maxillofacial surgery, which is more common in patients with malignant tumors treated with long-term intravenous administration of zoledronic acid [ 26 ]. Oral soft tissue in patients with MRONJ is difficult to heal after alveolar surgery. These patients develop osteomyelitis of the jaw several weeks later, with the formation of sequestrum, fistulas, etc. In 2014, the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons (AAOMS) recommended that MRONJ be expanded into medicine-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) [ 27 ]. AAOMS believes that in addition to BPs, other antiresorptive drugs such as denosumab, antiangiogenic drugs such as bevacizumab, and sunitinib may also cause osteonecrosis of the jaw [ 28 ]. Epidemiological statistics show that the incidence of MRONJ is significantly correlated with the patient's primary disease, the drugs used, the time of administration, the way of administration, and the dosage of medication [ 29 ]. For patients with postoperative chemotherapy for malignant tumors, regular intravenous use of zoledronic acid and alveolar surgery, the longer the medication time, the higher the incidence of MRONJ. No effective clinical treatment for MRONJ has yet been found [ 30 ]. Therefore, a series of preventive measures such as preventive dental care and timely intervention for early MRONJ symptoms are more important for patients who may develop MRONJ.
In this study, we further verified the clinical value of Sema4D in the early prediction of MRONJ, and provided the basis for the early warning and diagnosis of MRONJ. Since alveolar surgery is a known predisposing factor for MRONJ, we included in this study 97 patients at risk for MRONJ who underwent alveolar surgery at our hospital. After 12 weeks of follow-up, 42 patients were diagnosed with MRONJ, implying that the probability of alveolar surgery leading to the onset of MRONJ with major medication history of BPs is extremely high. We believe that this is because long-term medication of BPs and alveolar surgery are important risk factors for the occurrence of MRONJ, and their combined effects lead to a high incidence of MRONJ in our study population. We measured serum Sema4D levels in all participants at two time points before surgery (T0) and after the end of follow-up (T1). We found that the level of Sema4D in serum of patients with confirmed MRONJ was significantly lower than that of non-MRONJ and healthy controls at two different time points T0 and T1, suggesting that Sema4D may have an inhibitory effect on the occurrence and development of MRONJ. We further performed ROC analysis on Sema4D in both non-MRONJ and MRONJ groups at T0 and T1 time points. We further performed ROC analysis on the predictive effect of participants' serum Sema4D levels on MRONJ diagnosis. Our results show that Sema4D has a significant predictive value for the occurrence of MRONJ.
As a newly discovered family of proteins with the same domain, Semaphorins have bidirectional regulatory effects on osteoclasts and osteoblasts [ 31 ]. Factors in the Sema family that have been identified to play a role in bone homeostasis include Sema3A, Sema3E, Sema4D and so on [ 32 ]. Sema4D is clearly known to be expressed in osteoclasts. It can act on osteoblasts and can also counteract on osteoclasts [ 33 ]. Previous studies have shown that BPs and Sema4D act in opposite ways in many ways. BPs directly inhibited the activity and function of osteoclasts by inhibiting the RhoA and RANKL pathways, thereby reducing jaw bone resorption and increasing bone mineral density [ 34 ]. While Sema4D is expressed in osteoclasts, its receptor plexin B1 is expressed in osteoblasts [ 35 ]. Sema4D affects the migration of osteoclasts and the migration and functional activation of osteoblasts by activating the RhoA/ROCK pathway [ 36 ]. Therefore, it is possible to increase the concentration of sema4D in a cellular environment inhibited by BPs to increase the inhibitory effect of osteoblasts, thereby reducing bone formation. In this study, we also report the mutual exclusion of MRONJ and Sema4D, which is consistent with other findings. We demonstrate that serum Sema4D levels were significantly lower in patients with confirmed MRONJ compared to both non-MRONJ and healthy controls. Furthermore, we found that serum Sema4D levels were significantly lower in patients with grade III MRONJ relative to patients with grade I, II MRONJ. In addition, we reported that MRONJ patients who received intravenous BPs had significantly lower Sema4D levels than those who received oral BPs. This finding is in line with previous studies that patients with intravenous BPs had a higher prevalence of MRONJ than those with oral BPs. Our study to a certain extent indicates that the regulatory effect of Sema4D on bone homeostasis can be affected by BPs, which is related to the occurrence and development of MRONJ. However, the research at this stage is relatively basic, and the clear relationship between Sema4D in the occurrence and development of MRONJ has not been proved. We will continue to focus on this issue in future research.
Conclusion
In conclusion, we mainly investigated the relationship between serum Sema4D levels and the onset of MRONJ within 12 weeks after dentoalveolar surgery in patients with a history of BPs use in this study. We reported that Sema4D levels were significantly reduced in the serum of patients with confirmed MRONJ. Sema4D has a statistically predictive effect on the occurrence and diagnosis of MRONJ. We hope that our study will provide a rationale for early prevention and intervention of MRONJ.
Abbreviations
Bisphosphonates
Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw
Semaphorin 4D
Receptor activator of nuclear kappa-B
Enzyme-labeled immunosorbent assay
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Author contributions
HM, YP, LL, JL and CL performed the experiments, analyzed and interpreted the data. HM was a major contributor in writing the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding
No funding was received for this manuscript.
Availability of data and materials
All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article.
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The study was approved by the ethics committee of Cangzhou Central Hospital, and the participants signed written informed consent. The study was performed in strict accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects.
Consent for publication
All participants have given consent for publication.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
References
1. Yuan F Peng W Yang C Zheng J Teriparatide versus bisphosphonates for treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis: a meta-analysis Int J Surg 2019 66 1 11 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.03.004 30890377
2. Black DM Rosen CJ Clinical practice postmenopausal osteoporosis N Engl J Med 2016 374 254 262 10.1056/NEJMcp1513724 26789873
3. Ensrud KE Bisphosphonates for postmenopausal osteoporosis JAMA 2021 325 96 10.1001/jama.2020.2923 33399841
4. Tella SH Gallagher JC Prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 2014 142 155 170 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2013.09.008 24176761 PMC4187361
5. Favus MJ Bisphosphonates for osteoporosis N Engl J Med 2010 363 2027 2035 10.1056/NEJMct1004903 21083387
6. Reid IR A broader strategy for osteoporosis interventions Nat Rev Endocrinol 2020 16 333 339 10.1038/s41574-020-0339-7 32203407
7. Kim J Lee DH Dziak R Ciancio S Bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw: current clinical significance and treatment strategy review Am J Dent 2020 33 115 128 32470236
8. Ferreira LH Jr Mendonca KD Jr de Souza JC Dos Reis DCS do Guedes CCFV de Filice LSC Bisphosphonate-associated osteonecrosis of the jaw Minerva Dent Oral Sci 2021 70 49 57 32960522 10.23736/S2724-6329.20.04306-X
9. Chien HI Chen LW Liu WC Lin CT Ho YY Tsai WH Bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw Ann Plast Surg 2021 86 S78 S83 10.1097/SAP.0000000000002650 33346545
10. Shibahara T Antiresorptive Agent-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw (ARONJ): a twist of fate in the bone Tohoku J Exp Med 2019 247 75 86 10.1620/tjem.247.75 30713280
11. Otto S Pautke C Van den Wyngaert T Niepel D Schiodt M Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw: prevention, diagnosis and management in patients with cancer and bone metastases Cancer Treat Rev 2018 69 177 187 10.1016/j.ctrv.2018.06.007 30055439
12. Kawahara M Kuroshima S Sawase T Clinical considerations for medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw: a comprehensive literature review Int J Implant Dent 2021 7 47 10.1186/s40729-021-00323-0 33987769 PMC8119587
13. Alto LT Terman JR Semaphorins and their Signaling Mechanisms Methods Mol Biol 2017 1493 1 25 10.1007/978-1-4939-6448-2_1 27787839 PMC5538787
14. Zhang CL Hong CD Wang HL Chen AQ Zhou YF Wan Y The role of semaphorins in small vessels of the eye and brain Pharmacol Res 2020 160 105044 10.1016/j.phrs.2020.105044 32590102
15. Solmaz M Lane A Gonen B Akmamedova O Gunes MH Komurov K Graphical data mining of cancer mechanisms with SEMA Bioinformatics 2019 35 4413 4418 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz303 31070723 PMC6821276
16. Zhang Y Liu B Ma Y Jin B Sema 4D/CD100-plexin B is a multifunctional counter-receptor Cell Mol Immunol 2013 10 97 98 10.1038/cmi.2012.65 23262975 PMC4003050
17. Hernandez-Fleming M Rohrbach EW Bashaw GJ Sema-1a reverse signaling promotes midline crossing in response to secreted semaphorins Cell Rep 2017 18 174 184 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.12.027 28052247 PMC5253228
18. Ralston SH Bisphosphonates in the management of Paget's disease Bone 2020 138 115465 10.1016/j.bone.2020.115465 32512166
19. Takeuchi Y Innovation of bisphosphonates for improvement of adherence Clin Calcium 2017 27 197 202 28123121
20. Baroncelli GI Bertelloni S The use of bisphosphonates in pediatrics Horm Res Paediatr 2014 82 290 302 10.1159/000365889 25376487
21. Cremers S Papapoulos S Pharmacology of bisphosphonates Bone 2011 49 42 49 10.1016/j.bone.2011.01.014 21281748
22. Molvik H Khan W Bisphosphonates and their influence on fracture healing: a systematic review Osteoporos Int 2015 26 1251 1260 10.1007/s00198-014-3007-8 25572046
23. Lili Liu HM Pang Ying Caffeic acid treatment augments the cell proliferation, differentiation, and calcium mineralization in the human osteoblast-Like MG-63 cells Pharmacogn Mag 2021 17 6
24. Hong Mu YP Liu Lili Li F Wang J Citral promotes the cell proliferation, differentiation, and calcium mineralization in human osteoblast-like MG-63 Cells Pharmacogn Mag 2021 17 5
25. AlRahabi MK Ghabbani HM Clinical impact of bisphosphonates in root canal therapy Saudi Med J 2018 39 232 238 10.15537/smj.2018.3.20923 29543299 PMC5893910
26. Shannon J Shannon J Modelevsky S Grippo AA Bisphosphonates and osteonecrosis of the jaw J Am Geriatr Soc 2011 59 2350 2355 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03713.x 22091898
27. Kanwar N Bakr MM Meer M Siddiqi A Emerging therapies with potential risks of medicine-related osteonecrosis of the jaw: a review of the literature Br Dent J 2020 228 886 892 10.1038/s41415-020-1642-3 32541753
28. Gurav S Dholam KP Singh GP Treatment of refractory medicine related osteonecrosis of jaw with piezosurgical debridement and autologous platelet rich fibrin: feasibility study J Craniofac Surg 2021 10.1097/SCS.0000000000007981 34310422
29. Mathijssen NM Buma P Hannink G Combining bisphosphonates with allograft bone for implant fixation Cell Tissue Bank 2014 15 329 336 10.1007/s10561-013-9416-7 24370651
30. Cohen SB An update on bisphosphonates Curr Rheumatol Rep 2004 6 59 65 10.1007/s11926-004-0084-2 14713403
31. Yazdani U Terman JR The semaphorins Genome Biol 2006 7 211 10.1186/gb-2006-7-3-211 16584533 PMC1557745
32. Limoni G Niquille M Semaphorins and Plexins in central nervous system patterning: the key to it all? Curr Opin Neurobiol 2021 66 224 232 10.1016/j.conb.2020.12.014 33513538
33. Wu JH Li YN Chen AQ Hong CD Zhang CL Wang HL Inhibition of Sema4D/PlexinB1 signaling alleviates vascular dysfunction in diabetic retinopathy EMBO Mol Med 2020 12 e10154 10.15252/emmm.201810154 31943789 PMC7005627
34. Anastasilakis AD Polyzos SA Makras P Gkiomisi A Sakellariou G Savvidis M Circulating semaphorin-4D and plexin-B1 levels in postmenopausal women with low bone mass: the 3-month effect of zoledronic acid, denosumab or teriparatide treatment Expert Opin Ther Targets 2015 19 299 306 10.1517/14728222.2014.983078 25395071
35. Movila A Mawardi H Nishimura K Kiyama T Egashira K Kim JY Possible pathogenic engagement of soluble Semaphorin 4D produced by gammadeltaT cells in medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2016 480 42 47 10.1016/j.bbrc.2016.10.012 27720716
36. Zhang Y Wei L Miron RJ Zhang Q Bian Z Prevention of alveolar bone loss in an osteoporotic animal model via interference of semaphorin 4d J Dent Res 2014 93 1095 1100 10.1177/0022034514552676 25252878 PMC4293773