MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.2196/62836

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of medical Internet research · 2025

Mortality Risk Prediction in Patients With Antimelanoma Differentiation-Associated, Gene 5 Antibody-Positive, Dermatomyositis-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease: Algorithm Development and Validation.

Li Hui, Zou Ruyi, Xin Hongxia, He Ping, Xi Bin, Tian Yaqiong, Zhao Qi, Yan Xin, Qiu Xiaohua, Gao Yujuan, Liu Yin, Cao Min, Chen Bi, Han Qian, Chen Juan, Wang Guochun, Cai Hourong

СтатьяВалидационное исследованиеМногоцентровое исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Patients with antimelanoma differentiation-associated gene 5 antibody-positive dermatomyositis-associated interstitial lung disease (anti-MDA5+DM-ILD) are susceptible to rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease (RP-ILD) and have a high risk of mortality. There is an urgent need for a reliable prediction model, accessible via an easy-to-use web-based tool, to evaluate the risk of death.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to develop and validate a risk prediction model of 3-month mortality using machine learning (ML) in a large multicenter cohort of patients with anti-MDA5+DM-ILD in China.

METHODS

In total, 609 consecutive patients with anti-MDA5+DM-ILD were retrospectively enrolled from 6 hospitals across China. Patient demographics and laboratory and clinical parameters were collected on admission. The primary endpoint was 3-month mortality due to all causes. Six ML algorithms (Extreme Gradient Boosting [XGBoost], logistic regression (LR), Light Gradient Boosting Machine [LightGBM], random forest [RF], support vector machine [SVM], and k-nearest neighbor [KNN]) were applied to construct and evaluate the model.

RESULTS

After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, 509 (83.6%) of the 609 patients were included in our study, divided into a training cohort (n=203, 39.9%), an internal validation cohort (n=51, 10%), and 2 external validation cohorts (n=92, 18.1%, and n=163, 32%). ML identified 8 important variables as critical for model construction: RP-ILD, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), serum albumin (ALB) level, age, C-reactive protein (CRP) level, aspartate aminotransferase (AST) level, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level, and the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR). LR was chosen as the best algorithm for model construction, and the model demonstrated excellent performance, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) of 0.866, a sensitivity of 84.8%, and a specificity of 84.4% on the validation data set and an AUC of 0.90, a sensitivity of 85.0%, and a specificity of 83.9% on the training data set. Calibration curves and decision curve analysis (DCA) confirmed the model's accuracy and clinical applicability. Moreover, the model showed strong predictive performance in the external validation cohorts (cohort 1: AUC=0.836, 95% CI 0.754-0.916; cohort 2: AUC=0.915, 95% CI 0.871-0.959), indicating good generalizability. This model was integrated into a web-based tool to predict the 3-month mortality for patients with anti-MDA5+DM-ILD.

CONCLUSIONS

We successfully developed a robust clinical prediction model and an accompanying web tool to estimate the 3-month mortality risk for patients with anti-MDA5+DM-ILD.

Для цитирования: Li Hui, Zou Ruyi, Xin Hongxia, He Ping, Xi Bin, Tian Yaqiong, Zhao Qi, Yan Xin, Qiu Xiaohua, Gao Yujuan, Liu Yin, Cao Min, Chen Bi, Han Qian, Chen Juan, Wang Guochun, Cai Hourong. Mortality Risk Prediction in Patients With Antimelanoma Differentiation-Associated, Gene 5 Antibody-Positive, Dermatomyositis-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease: Algorithm Development and Validation.. Journal of medical Internet research. 2025. DOI: 10.2196/62836.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.