MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s13730-021-00649-z

Медицинская библиотека · CEN case reports · 2021

Effectiveness and safety of rehabilitation on minimal change nephrotic syndrome in remission for elderly patients with low activity of daily living: a case report.

Takahashi Ren, Yabe Hiroki, Hibino Takashi, Morishita Sayumi, Ishikawa Hideaki

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

There are few reports on the rehabilitation of elderly patients with minimal change nephrotic syndrome (MCNS). The purpose of this case study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of rehabilitation for an elderly patient with MCNS in remission. The patient was an 86-year-old woman. She was admitted to the hospital with a diagnosis of MCNS, and steroid treatment was initiated. She was weaned from dialysis 2 weeks later; however, her activities of daily living (ADL) decreased, and she developed disuse syndrome. After rehabilitation, the patient's ADL, maximum hand grip strength, and gait function improved. There was no recurrence of weight gain or increased proteinuria during rehabilitation, but the estimated glomerular filtration rate decreased. This case suggests that rehabilitation for elderly patients with MCNS in remission can be effective for physical and ADL functions without relapse of MCNS. The effect of exercise therapy on the relationship between exercise therapy and renal function needs to be further investigated by collecting more cases.

Для цитирования: Takahashi Ren, Yabe Hiroki, Hibino Takashi, Morishita Sayumi, Ishikawa Hideaki. Effectiveness and safety of rehabilitation on minimal change nephrotic syndrome in remission for elderly patients with low activity of daily living: a case report.. CEN case reports. 2021. DOI: 10.1007/s13730-021-00649-z.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.