MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jacr.2025.02.035

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR · 2025

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Cervical Pain or Cervical Radiculopathy: 2024 Update.

Expert Panel on Neurological Imaging, Eldaya Rami W, Parsons Matthew S, Hutchins Troy A, Avery Ryan, Burns Judah, Griffith Brent, Hassankhani Alvand, Khan Majid A, Ng Henry, Raizman Noah M, Reitman Charles, Shah Vinil N, Sliker Clint, Soliman Hesham, Timpone Vincent M, Tomaszewski Christian A, Yahyavi-Firouz-Abadi Noushin, Policeni Bruno

СтатьяКлинические рекомендацииПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Cervical spine pain is one of the most common reasons for seeking medical care as it ranks in the top 5 causes of global years lost to disability. The economic burden of cervical pain is also significant. Imaging is at the center of diagnosis of cervical pain and its causes. However, different symptoms and potential causes of cervical pain require different initial imaging to maximize the benefit of diagnostic usefulness of imaging. In this document we address different cervical pain variants with detailed assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of different modalities for addressing each specific variant. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.

Для цитирования: Expert Panel on Neurological Imaging, Eldaya Rami W, Parsons Matthew S, Hutchins Troy A, Avery Ryan, Burns Judah, Griffith Brent, Hassankhani Alvand, Khan Majid A, Ng Henry, Raizman Noah M, Reitman Charles, Shah Vinil N, Sliker Clint, Soliman Hesham, Timpone Vincent M, Tomaszewski Christian A, Yahyavi-Firouz-Abadi Noushin, Policeni Bruno. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Cervical Pain or Cervical Radiculopathy: 2024 Update.. Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2025.02.035.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.