MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/brb3.2023

Медицинская библиотека · Brain and behavior · 2021

Subjective versus objective symptom intensities ratings in cervical dystonia and hemifacial spasm across a botulinum neurotoxin cycle.

Wöllner Julia, Weise David, Leplow Bernd

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Subjective symptom complaints often do not match the expert's ratings in focal dystonia. Nonetheless, perceived symptom intensities drive compliance and outcome of botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) treatment.

METHODS

Perception of symptom development across a BoNT cycle was obtained in 21 cervical dystonia (CD) and 15 hemifacial spasm (HFS) patients at four time points during a BoNT cycle. Subjective assessments were recorded by means of a quality-of-life questionnaire and a patient diary containing items related to subjective severity of disease, mood, pain, social impairment, and quality of life. Medical investigation used the Tsui score and TWSTRS, and a HFS rating score, respectively.

RESULTS

In both patient groups, subjective intensities were strongly associated with psychological variables. Only in CD did objective assessment moderately correlate with subjective ratings solely at the beginning and the end of the BoNT cycle. Overall, the beneficial effects of BoNT treatment were only loosely associated with subjective experiences in both groups.

CONCLUSION

The emotional situation should be assessed regularly in patients undergoing BoNT therapy.

Для цитирования: Wöllner Julia, Weise David, Leplow Bernd. Subjective versus objective symptom intensities ratings in cervical dystonia and hemifacial spasm across a botulinum neurotoxin cycle.. Brain and behavior. 2021. DOI: 10.1002/brb3.2023.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.