Journal of occupational and environmental medicine · 2026
Screening Injured Workers for Risk of Extended Work Absence and Work Disability: Understanding the Evidence.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Erdil Michael, Shaw William S, Okurowski Lee, Torres Jonathan, Santiago Romero, Cloeren Marianne, Hoyle David, Filler Robert, Seidner Adam, Winters Thomas
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: Most individuals with work-related musculoskeletal disorders return to work in a medically predictable timeframe. For some, psychosocial and work factors influence work loss. Clinicians often lack knowledge and skills to identify and manage risks. This paper explores evidence regarding multidimensional tools (Orebro Musculoskeletal Pain Questionnaire, STarT Back Screening Tool) and ancillary assessments to identify at-risk patients.
METHODS: A multidisciplinary ACOEM member group composed a narrative review regarding feasibility and validity of screening injured workers.
RESULTS: Select measures appear feasible for administration and show reasonable validity to detect risks for extended work absence (limited strength of evidence). Potential screening adverse effects include misclassification.
CONCLUSIONS: Multidimensional and ancillary screening tools can help obtain a better understanding of injured workers and improve work outcomes. A future guidance will provide recommendations regarding tool adoption, use, and operational issues.
METHODS: A multidisciplinary ACOEM member group composed a narrative review regarding feasibility and validity of screening injured workers.
RESULTS: Select measures appear feasible for administration and show reasonable validity to detect risks for extended work absence (limited strength of evidence). Potential screening adverse effects include misclassification.
CONCLUSIONS: Multidimensional and ancillary screening tools can help obtain a better understanding of injured workers and improve work outcomes. A future guidance will provide recommendations regarding tool adoption, use, and operational issues.