BMJ open · 2026
Qualitative investigation evaluating Team USA Paralympic athletes: resources and recommendations for enhancing support systems.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kossman Melissa K, Triplett Ashley N, Post Eric G, Anderson Travis, Blauwet Cheri, Donaldson Amber, Eckenrod Morgan R, Finnoff Jonathan, Goosey-Tolfrey Victoria L, Tow Stephanie, Thornhill Heather L, Adams William M
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to explore athletes' perspectives on existing US Olympic & Paralympic Committee (USOPC) resources and to identify their recommendations for enhancing future initiatives aimed at promoting Paralympic athlete health, well-being and performance.
DESIGN: Phenomenological qualitative study SETTING: Online.
PARTICIPANTS: A convenience sample of 19 Team USA Paralympic athletes 18 years of age or older participated (female n=11; age 31±9 years) representing four categories of conditions recognised by the International Paralympic Committee (muscle and movement, bone-related, visual and central nervous system).
RESULTS: The resulting codebook included 2 themes and 10 corresponding categories. Theme 1, titled Resources for Paralympic Athletes, includes five categories: (1) community-level; (2) university-level; (3) USOPC; (4) National Governing Body and (5) Resources Access, Awareness and Satisfaction. Theme 2, titled Recommendations for Improvements to the USOPC, also included five categories: (1) sports medicine; (2) disability-specific needs and classification systems; (3) sports performance; (4) resources and (5) community awareness. Study participants recognised meaningful improvements in organisational support, including expanded financial assistance and mental-health services yet persistent structural inequities continue to limit equitable access to high-quality resources. Fragmented and geographically uneven sports medicine, coaching and performance infrastructures, along with ongoing challenges in classification transparency and disability-specific programming, remain key barriers to athlete development.
CONCLUSIONS: Findings highlight the need for decentralised clinical and performance networks, enhanced evidence-based classification practices and more robust transition planning from collegiate to elite settings. Including athlete perspectives and strengthening equitable resources creates more accessible, consistent and performance-optimising environments within the US Paralympic system.
DESIGN: Phenomenological qualitative study SETTING: Online.
PARTICIPANTS: A convenience sample of 19 Team USA Paralympic athletes 18 years of age or older participated (female n=11; age 31±9 years) representing four categories of conditions recognised by the International Paralympic Committee (muscle and movement, bone-related, visual and central nervous system).
RESULTS: The resulting codebook included 2 themes and 10 corresponding categories. Theme 1, titled Resources for Paralympic Athletes, includes five categories: (1) community-level; (2) university-level; (3) USOPC; (4) National Governing Body and (5) Resources Access, Awareness and Satisfaction. Theme 2, titled Recommendations for Improvements to the USOPC, also included five categories: (1) sports medicine; (2) disability-specific needs and classification systems; (3) sports performance; (4) resources and (5) community awareness. Study participants recognised meaningful improvements in organisational support, including expanded financial assistance and mental-health services yet persistent structural inequities continue to limit equitable access to high-quality resources. Fragmented and geographically uneven sports medicine, coaching and performance infrastructures, along with ongoing challenges in classification transparency and disability-specific programming, remain key barriers to athlete development.
CONCLUSIONS: Findings highlight the need for decentralised clinical and performance networks, enhanced evidence-based classification practices and more robust transition planning from collegiate to elite settings. Including athlete perspectives and strengthening equitable resources creates more accessible, consistent and performance-optimising environments within the US Paralympic system.