MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.5551/jat.65345

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis · 2025

Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Moderate-Intensity Pravastatin Versus Atorvastatin in Patients with Dyslipidemia: A Retrospective Cohort Study Using a Common Data Model of Multicenter Electronic Health Records in South Korea.

Chun Sung Wan, Kim Hae Jin, Seo Ji A, Chon Suk, Kim Sung Eun, Jung Jung Hwa, Kim Sang Soo, Lee Hyejin, Shin Sanghoon, Kim So Hun, Choi Dughyun, Park Hyeong Kyu, Kim Soo-Kyung, Bae Ji-Hwan, Jeong In-Kyung

СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

AIM: To compare the effectiveness and safety of moderate-intensity pravastatin 40 mg/day and atorvastatin 10 mg/day in patients with dyslipidemia.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study using electronic health records of 19 million patients across 14 secondary/tertiary hospitals, standardized to a Common Data Model. New users of pravastatin (40 mg/day) and atorvastatin (10 mg/day) were identified. Six distinct cohorts were used to assess the comparative effectiveness in preventing major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and the risks of new-onset diabetes mellitus (NODM), myalgia or rhabdomyolysis, and hepatotoxicity (measured by aspartate aminotransferase [AST]/alanine aminotransferase [ALT]). Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to each cohort for effectiveness and safety analyses, followed by a meta-analysis of hospital-specific results.

RESULTS

After PSM, patients were equally assigned to the pravastatin and atorvastatin groups for primary (n = 2,688/group) and secondary MACE prevention (n = 1,258/group) and to assess the risk of NODM (n = 2,391/group), new-onset myalgia or rhabdomyolysis (n = 11,799/group), and hepatotoxicity (AST, n = 4,034/group; ALT, n = 3,655/group). No significant differences were observed in the hazard ratios (HRs) for primary (HR = 0.84; 95% CI, 0.59-1.20) and secondary MACE prevention (HR = 0.89; 95% CI, 0.68-1.16). Similarly, no significant difference was observed in the risk of NODM (HR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.79-1.23). The risk of new-onset myalgia/rhabdomyolysis (HR = 0.82, 95% CI, 0.69-0.96) and the incidence of abnormal elevations in AST levels (2.35% vs. 3.37%, p<0.05) were significantly lower in the pravastatin group.

CONCLUSION

Moderate-intensity pravastatin (40 mg/day) showed comparable effectiveness to moderate-intensity atorvastatin (10 mg/day) in preventing MACE with a more favorable safety profile.

Для цитирования: Chun Sung Wan, Kim Hae Jin, Seo Ji A, Chon Suk, Kim Sung Eun, Jung Jung Hwa, Kim Sang Soo, Lee Hyejin, Shin Sanghoon, Kim So Hun, Choi Dughyun, Park Hyeong Kyu, Kim Soo-Kyung, Bae Ji-Hwan, Jeong In-Kyung. Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Moderate-Intensity Pravastatin Versus Atorvastatin in Patients with Dyslipidemia: A Retrospective Cohort Study Using a Common Data Model of Multicenter Electronic Health Records in South Korea.. Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis. 2025. DOI: 10.5551/jat.65345.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.