Magnetic resonance imaging · 2021
Lumbosacral plexus MR tractography: A novel diagnostic tool for extraspinal sciatica and pudendal neuralgia?
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lemos Nucelio, Melo Homero J F, Sermer Corey, Fernandes Gustavo, Ribeiro Augusta, Nascimento Geovanne, Luo Zhong Cheng, Girão Manoel J B C, Goldman Suzan Menasce
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Diagnosing extraspinal sciatica and pudendal neuralgia remains a clinical challenge. MRI and MR Neurography (MRN) are currently the standard techniques used to support the diagnosis of extraspinal lumbosacral plexus entrapments; however, for the intrapelvic portions of the lumbosacral plexus their accuracy is still limited. MR Tractography (MRT) feasibility to image the lumbosacral plexus has been demosntrated, but its clinical applications have yet to be determined.
PURPOSE: To correlate MRT with intraoperative findings in patients undergoing laparoscopic treatment of intrapelvic entrapments of the lumbosacral plexus and compare its accuracy with Neuropelveological clinical assessment and MRN.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of MRT reconstructions of diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) sequences acquired for the MRN collected from a cohort of 13 patients undergoing laparoscopic detrapment of the lumbosacral plexus. The primary outcome of this study was the correlation of MRT reconstruction with intraoperative findings. Secondary outcomes included the correlation of MRN, preoperative Neuropelveological clinical diagnoses and the diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) fractional anisotropy (FA) and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) in patients undergoing pelvic MRI and MRN for the investigation of intrapelvic nerve entrapments.
RESULTS: MRT correlated with intraoperative findings in 11 of 13 patients (85%). Neuropelveological clinical assessment was able to accurately diagnose a pelvic nerve entrapment in 12/13 patients (92%) and MRN agreed with surgical findings in only 2/13 (15%) patients. MRT was significantly superior to MRN (p < 0.001). FA and ADC did not correlate with the identification of a nerve entrapment, likely due to limitations regarding the placement of the seedpoints.
CONCLUSIONS: This initial, retrospective analysis, suggests that MRT is superior to MRN at diagnosing intrapelvic entrapments of the lumbosacral plexus. A prospective, double-blinded study is underway to validate this data, but these initial findings show great potential for MRT as a diagnostic tool for extraspinal sciatica and pudendal neuralgia. Clinical Trials Registry: U1111-1261-4910 (REBEC - Brazilian Registry for Clinical Trials).
PURPOSE: To correlate MRT with intraoperative findings in patients undergoing laparoscopic treatment of intrapelvic entrapments of the lumbosacral plexus and compare its accuracy with Neuropelveological clinical assessment and MRN.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of MRT reconstructions of diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) sequences acquired for the MRN collected from a cohort of 13 patients undergoing laparoscopic detrapment of the lumbosacral plexus. The primary outcome of this study was the correlation of MRT reconstruction with intraoperative findings. Secondary outcomes included the correlation of MRN, preoperative Neuropelveological clinical diagnoses and the diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) fractional anisotropy (FA) and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) in patients undergoing pelvic MRI and MRN for the investigation of intrapelvic nerve entrapments.
RESULTS: MRT correlated with intraoperative findings in 11 of 13 patients (85%). Neuropelveological clinical assessment was able to accurately diagnose a pelvic nerve entrapment in 12/13 patients (92%) and MRN agreed with surgical findings in only 2/13 (15%) patients. MRT was significantly superior to MRN (p < 0.001). FA and ADC did not correlate with the identification of a nerve entrapment, likely due to limitations regarding the placement of the seedpoints.
CONCLUSIONS: This initial, retrospective analysis, suggests that MRT is superior to MRN at diagnosing intrapelvic entrapments of the lumbosacral plexus. A prospective, double-blinded study is underway to validate this data, but these initial findings show great potential for MRT as a diagnostic tool for extraspinal sciatica and pudendal neuralgia. Clinical Trials Registry: U1111-1261-4910 (REBEC - Brazilian Registry for Clinical Trials).