Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
Radiological and Clinical Outcome Differences Between Standard and Short Stem in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review.
СтатьяСистематический обзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ciuffreda Mauro, Lentini Antongiulio, Papalia Giuseppe Francesco, Grasso Domenico, Za Pierangelo, Papalia Rocco, Rizzello Giacomo
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: In recent years, the use of short cementless humeral components in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) has increased. This systematic review aimed to compare the radiological and clinical outcomes of uncemented RTSA using short versus standard humeral stems and assess the impact of these radiological changes on clinical outcomes.
METHODS: A systematic electronic search was performed by two independent reviewers using PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases on 10 December 2024. Inclusion criteria involved studies that assessed the radiological and clinical outcomes and overall complication rates of cementless RTSA with short or standard stems in patients with osteoarthritis, cuff tear arthropathy, post-traumatic, and rheumatoid arthritis with a follow-up of at least 1 year. The following data were extracted: radiological parameters of stems including implant subsidence, humeral loosening, and humeral osteolysis and clinical outcomes as Visual Analog Scale pain, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Constant Score and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation score.
RESULTS: A total of 13 studies including 1485 shoulders in 1460 patients were analyzed with a median age at surgery of 74.5 years. The short stem group recorded worse radiological outcomes examined such as humeral loosening, lucencies around the implants, and osteolysis. No significant differences were observed in the clinical outcomes and overall complications between the two types of stems.
CONCLUSIONS: Both short and standard stems are valid options in cementless RTSA. Minimal differences in radiological outcomes were found in favor of RTSA implanted with short stems, while postoperative clinical outcomes were similar between the two types of implants.
METHODS: A systematic electronic search was performed by two independent reviewers using PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases on 10 December 2024. Inclusion criteria involved studies that assessed the radiological and clinical outcomes and overall complication rates of cementless RTSA with short or standard stems in patients with osteoarthritis, cuff tear arthropathy, post-traumatic, and rheumatoid arthritis with a follow-up of at least 1 year. The following data were extracted: radiological parameters of stems including implant subsidence, humeral loosening, and humeral osteolysis and clinical outcomes as Visual Analog Scale pain, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Constant Score and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation score.
RESULTS: A total of 13 studies including 1485 shoulders in 1460 patients were analyzed with a median age at surgery of 74.5 years. The short stem group recorded worse radiological outcomes examined such as humeral loosening, lucencies around the implants, and osteolysis. No significant differences were observed in the clinical outcomes and overall complications between the two types of stems.
CONCLUSIONS: Both short and standard stems are valid options in cementless RTSA. Minimal differences in radiological outcomes were found in favor of RTSA implanted with short stems, while postoperative clinical outcomes were similar between the two types of implants.