Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS · 2024
Artificial dermal repair for larger finger pulp defects: Satisfactory coverage with limitations in sensation and inevitable scar formation.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Fang Jialiu, Zhang Jisen, Tang Jin Bo
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: This prospective study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of the use of dermal templates for lengthy volar soft tissue defects (1.5-4 cm) in the fingers.
METHODS: The volar soft tissue defects of 15 patients (19 fingers) were treated with Lando dermal template coverage between June 2022 and November 2022. We evaluated sensory recovery, scar formation, and overall appearance of the repair site at an average of 13 months (range, 12-17 months) of follow-up.
RESULTS: The defect healed in all cases. We found an average static 2-point discrimination of 7 mm (range 4 to 14 mm). Scar formation was evident in all cases. The repair did not restore the bulkiness of the volar finger, especially in the finger with the bony exposure. Nail deformities and joint contracture were observed in some cases.
CONCLUSION: Dermal template repair does not restore normal sensation and inevitably leads to scar formation when the defect is longer (>1.5 cm). Bulkiness of the volar finger is not restored in most patients, especially when there was bone or tendon exposure in the initial wound site.
METHODS: The volar soft tissue defects of 15 patients (19 fingers) were treated with Lando dermal template coverage between June 2022 and November 2022. We evaluated sensory recovery, scar formation, and overall appearance of the repair site at an average of 13 months (range, 12-17 months) of follow-up.
RESULTS: The defect healed in all cases. We found an average static 2-point discrimination of 7 mm (range 4 to 14 mm). Scar formation was evident in all cases. The repair did not restore the bulkiness of the volar finger, especially in the finger with the bony exposure. Nail deformities and joint contracture were observed in some cases.
CONCLUSION: Dermal template repair does not restore normal sensation and inevitably leads to scar formation when the defect is longer (>1.5 cm). Bulkiness of the volar finger is not restored in most patients, especially when there was bone or tendon exposure in the initial wound site.