The degree of invasiveness has no influence on the rate of incidental durotomies in surgery for lumbar spinal canal stenosis: data from the German spine registry.

BACKGROUND

Risk factors for incidental durotomies are good documented by some authors who consider the degree of invasiveness as a direct risk factor on this serious complication. We compared the rate of incidental durotomies and its dependence from the degree of invasiveness.

METHODS

The German Spine Registry could document 6016 surgeries for lumbar spinal canal stenosis, N.=2539 microsurgical decompression, and N.=2371 open decompression with stabilization.

RESULTS

Both groups were identical concerning age and sex of patients, mean age: 77.1±1.60; females: 58%; males: 32%. There were 410 incidental durotomies, group 1: 209 (8.23%); group 2: 201 (8.47%). This difference is statistically not relevant (P=0,75). A surgical therapy is documented in 345 (84%) cases, suture with/without fibrin glue: group 1=162 and group 2=183. Fifty-nine patients had a persistent fistula that needed treatment with a lumbar drain, group 1: N.=30; and group 2: N.=29.

CONCLUSIONS

The groups decompression vs. decompression plus fusion are statistically comparable. Although the stabilization with instrumentation is a more invasive procedure with longer operation times, trauma tissue and blood loss - in comparison with microsurgical decompression - showed no difference in the rate of incidental durotomies.