BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025
Assessing the quality of care for knee osteoarthritis in Singapore: a cross-sectional study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Tan Ren Hao Linus, Goff Anthony J, Lim Chien Joo, Tan Yijia Bryan
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to assess the self-reported quality of care for people with knee osteoarthritis in Singapore and to investigate the associations between participant characteristics and functional outcomes at 1 year in relation to the reported quality of care.
METHODS: Patients with knee osteoarthritis completed the osteoarthritis quality indicator (OA-QI) questionnaire, a validated patient-reported measure that assesses the clinician's adherence to evidence-based guidelines for non-surgical knee osteoarthritis education and patient education. The OA-QI includes 17 indicators, with "achievement" defined as a 'Yes' response for each. We calculated individual per-item, overall per-item mean, and per-person achievement rates (%) and examined associations between participant characteristics, achievement rates, and function at 1 year.
RESULTS: A total of 314 participants completed the OA-QI. Referral for physical activity (87.5%) and referral for daily activity aid assessment (15.7%) had the highest and lowest per-item achievement rates, respectively. The overall mean per-item and per-person achievement rates were both 62.2%. Participants educated about steroid injections (adjusted coefficient [95% CI]: 7.23 [1.42-13.04]; p = 0.015) or surgery (adjusted coefficient [95% CI]: 12.65 [5.89-19.40]; p < 0.001) had worse functional outcomes at one year than those who were eligible but not informed. Those not assessed for walking aids and indicating walking issues had poorer outcomes one year later (adjusted coefficient [95% CI]: -9.89 (-19.63, -0.15); p = 0.0470). However, no significant associations were found between per-person achievement rates and 1-year functional outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: The quality of care in Singapore for people with knee osteoarthritis is suboptimal, especially for those needing walking aids and weight loss assistance. However, the quality of care alone does not fully account for long-term outcomes, suggesting that other factors need to be considered.
METHODS: Patients with knee osteoarthritis completed the osteoarthritis quality indicator (OA-QI) questionnaire, a validated patient-reported measure that assesses the clinician's adherence to evidence-based guidelines for non-surgical knee osteoarthritis education and patient education. The OA-QI includes 17 indicators, with "achievement" defined as a 'Yes' response for each. We calculated individual per-item, overall per-item mean, and per-person achievement rates (%) and examined associations between participant characteristics, achievement rates, and function at 1 year.
RESULTS: A total of 314 participants completed the OA-QI. Referral for physical activity (87.5%) and referral for daily activity aid assessment (15.7%) had the highest and lowest per-item achievement rates, respectively. The overall mean per-item and per-person achievement rates were both 62.2%. Participants educated about steroid injections (adjusted coefficient [95% CI]: 7.23 [1.42-13.04]; p = 0.015) or surgery (adjusted coefficient [95% CI]: 12.65 [5.89-19.40]; p < 0.001) had worse functional outcomes at one year than those who were eligible but not informed. Those not assessed for walking aids and indicating walking issues had poorer outcomes one year later (adjusted coefficient [95% CI]: -9.89 (-19.63, -0.15); p = 0.0470). However, no significant associations were found between per-person achievement rates and 1-year functional outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: The quality of care in Singapore for people with knee osteoarthritis is suboptimal, especially for those needing walking aids and weight loss assistance. However, the quality of care alone does not fully account for long-term outcomes, suggesting that other factors need to be considered.