Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists · 2010
Feasibility and limitations of an automated 2D-3D rigid image registration system for complex endovascular aortic procedures.
Оценочное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Carrell Tom W G, Modarai Bijan, Brown James R I, Penney Graeme P
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To examine the feasibility of an automated 2-dimensional (2D) to 3- dimensional (3D) image registration system to simplify the navigational challenges faced in complex endovascular aortic procedures.
METHODS: An automated 2D-3D image registration system was used to overlay pre-acquired 3D computed tomography images onto fluoroscopy images taken during endovascular aneurysm repair. Errors between the 3D overlay and digital subtraction angiograms were measured and correlated with aortic neck angulation. A mean discrepancy < or =3 mm was considered clinically acceptable.
RESULTS: There was a strong correlation between maximum neck angulation and maximum registration error (Pearson's r = 0.75). Aortas with a maximum neck angulation < or =30 degrees had a mean error of 2.5+/-1.2 mm, whereas aortas with neck angulation >30 degrees had a mean error of 6.2+/-2.5 mm (p<0.0001).
CONCLUSION: The major source of registration errors is aortic deformation caused by the presence of the introducer and endovascular graft. Further work is required if this technology is to be routinely applied to severely angulated aortic anatomy.
METHODS: An automated 2D-3D image registration system was used to overlay pre-acquired 3D computed tomography images onto fluoroscopy images taken during endovascular aneurysm repair. Errors between the 3D overlay and digital subtraction angiograms were measured and correlated with aortic neck angulation. A mean discrepancy < or =3 mm was considered clinically acceptable.
RESULTS: There was a strong correlation between maximum neck angulation and maximum registration error (Pearson's r = 0.75). Aortas with a maximum neck angulation < or =30 degrees had a mean error of 2.5+/-1.2 mm, whereas aortas with neck angulation >30 degrees had a mean error of 6.2+/-2.5 mm (p<0.0001).
CONCLUSION: The major source of registration errors is aortic deformation caused by the presence of the introducer and endovascular graft. Further work is required if this technology is to be routinely applied to severely angulated aortic anatomy.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Angiography, Digital SubtractionAortic DiseasesAortographyAutomation, LaboratoryBlood Vessel ProsthesisBlood Vessel Prosthesis ImplantationFeasibility StudiesHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalLondonLumbar VertebraePredictive Value of TestsProsthesis DesignRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedRenal ArteryRetrospective StudiesStentsSurgery, Computer-AssistedTomography, X-Ray Computed