m+Medelevator.RU
← Поиск публикаций
European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026

Intraoperative full-spine imaging with C-arm using a deep learning-based automatic stitching model: development and clinical validation.

СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Liu Yibing, Zhu Guomao, Zhang Zhenzhuo, Liang Jinqian

Аннотация

PURPOSE: To develop and clinically validate an automated deep learning–based stitching model for intraoperative generation of full-length spinal radiographs from segmented C-arm fluoroscopy during scoliosis surgery. METHODS: A deep learning model was developed to detect pedicle screws and align sequential intraoperative C-arm images to reconstruct a full-length spine view. For clinical validation, we retrospectively analyzed 43 scoliosis patients (2018–2023) with adequate intraoperative segmented sequences. Stitched intraoperative images (Method A) were compared with postoperative full-length standing digital radiographs as the reference standard (Method B). Five spine surgeons independently measured coronal Cobb angles on both image sets. Interobserver reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Agreement between methods was evaluated using ICC, Bland–Altman analysis, and absolute paired differences. RESULTS: The model generated stitched full-length images within 5 s. The mean absolute Cobb angle difference between Methods A and B was 1.95°(SD 2.81°), with a median of 0.20°(IQR 0.00–2.80°) and a range of 0.00–9.80°. Absolute differences were ≤ 1°, ≤ 3°, and ≤ 5° in 76.74%, 88.37%, and 97.67% of paired measurements. Interobserver reliability was excellent (ICC 0.999 for Method A; 0.998 for Method B). Between-method agreement was high (ICC 0.991) with minimal bias (mean difference − 0.13°, 95% limits of agreement − 4.20° to 3.93°). CONCLUSION: Automated stitching of routine intraoperative C-arm images can rapidly produce full-length spinal radiographs with excellent Cobb angle agreement versus postoperative DR, supporting intraoperative alignment assessment.

ИП Урсолов Владлен Сергеевич

ИНН 500118482352 · ОГРНИП 314500117700049

Реквизиты и контакты