Spine deformity · 2015
Instrumentation Strategies to Reduce the Risks of Proximal Junctional Kyphosis in Adult Scoliosis: A Detailed Biomechanical Analysis.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Aubin Carl-Eric, Cammarata Marco, Wang Xiaoyu, Mac-Thiong Jean-Marc
Аннотация
STUDY DESIGN: Biomechanical analysis of proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) through numerical simulations.
OBJECTIVES: Assessment of the effect of sagittal alignment, the upper instrumented vertebral level (UIV), and 4 other surgical variables on biomechanical indices related to the PJK risks.
SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Despite retrospective clinical studies, biomechanical analysis of individual parameters associated with PJK is lacking to support instrumentation strategies to reduce the PJK risks.
METHODS: Instrumentations of 6 adult scoliosis cases with different operative strategies were simulated (1,152 simulations). Proximal junctional (PJ) angle and flexion loads were evaluated against the sagittal alignment and the proximal instrumentation level.
RESULTS: Instrumenting 1 more proximal vertebra allowed the PJ angle, proximal moment, and force to be reduced by 18%, 25%, and 16%, respectively. Shifting sagittal alignment by 20 mm posteriorly increased the PJ angle and proximal moment by 16% and 22%, and increased the equivalent posterior extensor force by 37%. Bilateral complete facetectomy, posterior ligaments resection, and the combination of the 2 resulted in an increase of the PJ angle (by 10%, 28%, and 53%, respectively), flexion forces (by 4%, 12%, and 22%, respectively), and proximal moments (by 16%, 44%, and 83%, respectively). Transverse process hooks at UIV compared with pedicle screws allowed 26% lower PJ angle and flexion loads. The use of proximal transition rods with proximal diameter reduced from 5.5 to 4 mm slightly reduced PJ angle, flexion force, and moment (less than 8%). The increase in sagittal rod curvature from 10° to 40° increased the PJ angle (from 6% to 19%), flexion force (from 3% to 10%), and moment (from 9% to 27%).
CONCLUSIONS: Simulated posteriorly shifted sagittal alignment was associated with higher PJK risks, whereas extending instrumentation proximally allowed a lower mechanical risk of PJK. Preserving PJ intervertebral elements and using a more flexible anchorage at UIV help reduce the biomechanical risks of PJK.
OBJECTIVES: Assessment of the effect of sagittal alignment, the upper instrumented vertebral level (UIV), and 4 other surgical variables on biomechanical indices related to the PJK risks.
SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Despite retrospective clinical studies, biomechanical analysis of individual parameters associated with PJK is lacking to support instrumentation strategies to reduce the PJK risks.
METHODS: Instrumentations of 6 adult scoliosis cases with different operative strategies were simulated (1,152 simulations). Proximal junctional (PJ) angle and flexion loads were evaluated against the sagittal alignment and the proximal instrumentation level.
RESULTS: Instrumenting 1 more proximal vertebra allowed the PJ angle, proximal moment, and force to be reduced by 18%, 25%, and 16%, respectively. Shifting sagittal alignment by 20 mm posteriorly increased the PJ angle and proximal moment by 16% and 22%, and increased the equivalent posterior extensor force by 37%. Bilateral complete facetectomy, posterior ligaments resection, and the combination of the 2 resulted in an increase of the PJ angle (by 10%, 28%, and 53%, respectively), flexion forces (by 4%, 12%, and 22%, respectively), and proximal moments (by 16%, 44%, and 83%, respectively). Transverse process hooks at UIV compared with pedicle screws allowed 26% lower PJ angle and flexion loads. The use of proximal transition rods with proximal diameter reduced from 5.5 to 4 mm slightly reduced PJ angle, flexion force, and moment (less than 8%). The increase in sagittal rod curvature from 10° to 40° increased the PJ angle (from 6% to 19%), flexion force (from 3% to 10%), and moment (from 9% to 27%).
CONCLUSIONS: Simulated posteriorly shifted sagittal alignment was associated with higher PJK risks, whereas extending instrumentation proximally allowed a lower mechanical risk of PJK. Preserving PJ intervertebral elements and using a more flexible anchorage at UIV help reduce the biomechanical risks of PJK.